Dear every one,
I have a problem with classpad300, when I try to find the inverse of a 4 by 4 matrix I receive an error (insufficient memory)! Note that the matrix elements are variables i.e. a,b,c,d,...etc. not numbers.
Isn't 500KB of working RAM enough for this simple operation? Can any one lead me to a way finding that inverse of 4x4 MAT.
Thanks.
Classpad Error
Started by
ECE
, Feb 08 2008 02:37 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
ECE
-
- Members
-
- 152 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:USA
-
Calculators:
ClassPad300 Plus o.s3.06.1000
fx-CG20 o.s1.04
fx9860GII SD o.s2.00
fx9860G Slim o.s1.10
fx9860GSD o.s2.01 (GII hacked)
Algebra FX2.0 Plus
CFX9850GBplus
fx5800p
fx3650p
fx570ES Plus
EA-200 Casio Data Analyzer
Posted 08 February 2008 - 02:37 PM
#2
kucalc
-
- [Legends]
-
- 1422 posts
Casio Maniac
- Gender:Male
- Location:USA
-
Interests:Programming: C/C++, Fortran, LISP, COBOL 85 Standard, PHP, x86 and SH3 Assembly
Computer graphics -
Calculators:
fx-9860G / fx-7400G Plus / Algebra FX 2.0+ / fx-9770G / CFX-9850G / CFX-9850GB+ / TI-89 / TI-nSpire
Posted 08 February 2008 - 02:42 PM
Hello M. Yasser and welcome to the UCF. 
I've heard of problems with inverse matrices before on the ClassPad. Maybe it's because you're using an old OS. I think you need to upgrade the OS.
I've heard of problems with inverse matrices before on the ClassPad. Maybe it's because you're using an old OS. I think you need to upgrade the OS.
#3
ECE
-
- Members
-
- 152 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:USA
-
Calculators:
ClassPad300 Plus o.s3.06.1000
fx-CG20 o.s1.04
fx9860GII SD o.s2.00
fx9860G Slim o.s1.10
fx9860GSD o.s2.01 (GII hacked)
Algebra FX2.0 Plus
CFX9850GBplus
fx5800p
fx3650p
fx570ES Plus
EA-200 Casio Data Analyzer
Posted 08 February 2008 - 02:59 PM
I'm here to get help specifically about o.s v.3.0 .
#4
LanceGary
-
- Members
-
- 5 posts
Newbie
-
Calculators:
fx-9860G SD
Posted 09 February 2008 - 11:23 AM
If the entries are simply variables (as opposed to plynomials or the like) (i.e., letters standing for any particular number) then what you want, it seems to me, is the general method for finding inverses for matrices of that size. (Of course, not all matrices have inverses). So why not just find a book that shows how to invert a 4 x 4 matrix? For example, a method for inverting a 3 x 3 matrix is shown here:
http://www.purplemat...es/mtrxinvr.htm
If your "variables" are really polynomials or other expressions rather than just letters standing for numbers there seem to be specialized methods for finding inveres:
http://ieeexplore.ie.......1727&code=4
Lance
http://www.purplemat...es/mtrxinvr.htm
If your "variables" are really polynomials or other expressions rather than just letters standing for numbers there seem to be specialized methods for finding inveres:
http://ieeexplore.ie.......1727&code=4
Lance
#5
ECE
-
- Members
-
- 152 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:USA
-
Calculators:
ClassPad300 Plus o.s3.06.1000
fx-CG20 o.s1.04
fx9860GII SD o.s2.00
fx9860G Slim o.s1.10
fx9860GSD o.s2.01 (GII hacked)
Algebra FX2.0 Plus
CFX9850GBplus
fx5800p
fx3650p
fx570ES Plus
EA-200 Casio Data Analyzer
Posted 09 February 2008 - 12:45 PM
The problem is not with the method I'm sort of familiar with Linear Algebra; but the method that that ClassPad calculates symbolic math maybe the problem?
Note that the variables i.e. (a, b, c, d, e, ?etc)where all cleared before the procedure so as to get the results in symbolic form (to derive a general form of an equation).
Note that the variables i.e. (a, b, c, d, e, ?etc)where all cleared before the procedure so as to get the results in symbolic form (to derive a general form of an equation).
#6
Guest_gatico_*
Guest_gatico_*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 February 2008 - 03:52 AM
I'm receiving the same message when I try to do a "hard" integration, for example:
∫(x+(36*x+3)/(2*x+tan(2*x)),x)
I tried it on Maple and on the TI-89 and the solved it withouth any problem, but I don't know why I'm receiving this message.
∫(x+(36*x+3)/(2*x+tan(2*x)),x)
I tried it on Maple and on the TI-89 and the solved it withouth any problem, but I don't know why I'm receiving this message.
#7
ECE
-
- Members
-
- 152 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:USA
-
Calculators:
ClassPad300 Plus o.s3.06.1000
fx-CG20 o.s1.04
fx9860GII SD o.s2.00
fx9860G Slim o.s1.10
fx9860GSD o.s2.01 (GII hacked)
Algebra FX2.0 Plus
CFX9850GBplus
fx5800p
fx3650p
fx570ES Plus
EA-200 Casio Data Analyzer
Posted 11 February 2008 - 02:48 PM
some one post to me the folowig,
A hard integration may require more specialised algorithms. I don't think matrix inversion requires different algorithms according to the size of the matrix - just a scaling up. So whilst I don't know the reason for failing with an integration problem (it could be stack size, but it could be an algorithm failure), I suspect that the reason for the matrix inversion failure is keeping track of all the symbols, and where they are located in the final matrix, i.e., I think the memory outage occurs with the parsing stacks (there is just too much to keep track of within that provided stack).
A hard integration may require more specialised algorithms. I don't think matrix inversion requires different algorithms according to the size of the matrix - just a scaling up. So whilst I don't know the reason for failing with an integration problem (it could be stack size, but it could be an algorithm failure), I suspect that the reason for the matrix inversion failure is keeping track of all the symbols, and where they are located in the final matrix, i.e., I think the memory outage occurs with the parsing stacks (there is just too much to keep track of within that provided stack).
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
