Ans Option
#1
Posted 22 March 2005 - 12:46 AM
I had often useed the [ANS] Button on my CFX to get the result for further operations.
On the CFX you have to press the EXE' /> Key first to load the ANS variable first in the command line.
On the CP300 you had to press the [ANS] button on the tuchscreen, this is bad for fast operations. Can I program my CP300 in the way of the CFX?
Pressing the EXE' /> button on the blank command line displays the ANS variable?
Please help
Sorry for my bad english I hope you understand it anyway.
#2
Posted 22 March 2005 - 03:44 AM
#3
Posted 22 March 2005 - 09:14 AM
we might see some kind of change in the way ANS works on the cp in the future, i agree that it would be nice...
#4
Posted 22 March 2005 - 09:47 AM
#5
Posted 22 March 2005 - 02:30 PM
#6
Posted 22 March 2005 - 06:10 PM
no, brian told me that they register as the same key even when using the SDK, he was going to try to find out if they really are hardwired to be the same key, or if they could be manipulated seperately... if they cant then the CP hardware needs to be changed.
Bad Design
#7
Posted 24 March 2005 - 02:27 AM
they have to think about in a shift key
i think the classpad next generation with this lot of suggestions going a be a very powerful tool
but by the moment is a good tool, a little slack
#8
Posted 24 March 2005 - 10:27 AM
i think the classpad next generation with this lot of suggestions going a be a very powerful tool
but by the moment is a good tool, a little slack
hehe, I don't think so. cuz if CASIO would consider our suggestions, never released OS v2.0 .
#9
Posted 27 March 2005 - 05:05 AM
BTW, it isn't as nice as an [ANS] key, but some operations will automatically assume ANS if you don't give an argument. For example, enter sin( without and argument and it will assume ANS. Personally I don't like this because it is too easy to enter a syntax error by mistake and not know about it because the ClassPad tried to be smart. (Yeah, yeah.. I can already see the jokes coming about the ClassPad trying to be smart ).
#10
Posted 27 March 2005 - 05:34 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users