Hi, is my firts messange in this forum... well i?m a material?s engineering student and a have a wonderfull AFX but, i think to buy a ClassPad for the upgrades in the programing language and to introduce my self to the programing in the diferent issues about the world of mechanicall metalurgy. Could you tell me if the GlassPad is much better than the AFX in the programing and graphing areas? Is better to study engineering??? Thaks a lot and i hope be an active member of this comunity...
Classpad Vs Afx
Started by
Trieste
, Mar 04 2006 11:59 PM
1 reply to this topic
#1
Trieste
-
- Members
-
- 4 posts
Newbie
-
Calculators:
FX 2.0 Algebra and maybe a Classpad 300
Posted 04 March 2006 - 11:59 PM
#2
Lovecasio
-
- Members
-
- 242 posts
Casio Freak
- Location:Hochiminh city Vietnam
- Interests:Organic chemistry.<br />Pharmacy
-
Calculators:
fx 570 MS, Casio AFX 2.0+, ClassPad 300
Posted 05 March 2006 - 12:11 PM
Hi. 
It can be said that ClassPad has better graphing application, but not "much better". About programming language, the ClassPad Basics is identical to the AFX and even better, the SDK (programming in C++), which is the best tool allow you to make your own add-ins for CP, and third is CPLua (powerful but easy to learn than SDK). Many people said ClassPad is not very useful for engineering student, but in future OS, it might be.
It can be said that ClassPad has better graphing application, but not "much better". About programming language, the ClassPad Basics is identical to the AFX and even better, the SDK (programming in C++), which is the best tool allow you to make your own add-ins for CP, and third is CPLua (powerful but easy to learn than SDK). Many people said ClassPad is not very useful for engineering student, but in future OS, it might be.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
