From Which Model This Part Of Manual?
#1 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
Posted 19 March 2008 - 06:47 PM
Define the model #.
#2
Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:09 PM
#3 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:45 PM
#4 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
Posted 20 March 2008 - 06:05 PM
#5
Posted 21 March 2008 - 01:45 PM
is there no AC key to clear the error status?
#6 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
Posted 21 March 2008 - 08:11 PM
#7
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:20 PM
#8 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
Posted 22 March 2008 - 06:47 AM
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key.
#9
Posted 22 March 2008 - 03:35 PM
#10 Guest_Frederick_*
Posted 13 November 2010 - 09:39 PM
This is the Casio fx-81. Very interesting calculator. It has not statictics functions on the manual, however really exists on the calculator.
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key.
#11 Guest_Frederick_*
Posted 13 November 2010 - 09:48 PM
This is the Casio fx-81. Very interesting calculator. It has not statictics functions on the manual, however really exists on the calculator.
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key.
There's a catch: I think the stat functions are wrong.
I was given an fx-81 in high school in the 80's. Somewhere along the line I discovered the hidden functionality by comparing it with a friend's more advanced calculator (probably an 82). All through college I cleverly used the hidden stat functions in my lab classes. After graduation, one day when I was reading through (iirc) alt.folklore.computers, I got into a conversation about the fx-81. I talked about how I used its hidden stat functions, and then someone who had been involved in the production chimed in.. turns out, the initial run of the chip had a bug that made it miscalculate the stat results. Rather than tossing them, they used those chips to make a downgraded version of the calculator.
All that time I thought I was being clever by accessing the hidden capacity of my calculator .. but my results were subtly wrong.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users