Jump to content



- - - - -

From Which Model This Part Of Manual?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 19 March 2008 - 06:47 PM

This is a part of the old Casio calculator manual.

Posted Image

Define the model #.

#2 Xerxes

Xerxes

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:09 PM

Casio Mini?

#3 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:45 PM

No, on the Casio Mini the error is "all zeros".

#4 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 March 2008 - 06:05 PM

Posted Image

#5 Xerxes

Xerxes

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 March 2008 - 01:45 PM

It seems to be a scientific calculator because of the "DEG". But
is there no AC key to clear the error status?

#6 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 21 March 2008 - 08:11 PM

No, AC key can't clear this ERROR sign.

#7 Xerxes

Xerxes

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:20 PM

Probably FX-5/7/81? If not, a further hint maybe useful.

#8 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 22 March 2008 - 06:47 AM

This is the Casio fx-81. Very interesting calculator. It has not statictics functions on the manual, however really exists on the calculator.
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key. :)

#9 Xerxes

Xerxes

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 130 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 March 2008 - 03:35 PM

Ok, I understand. Interesting behaviour of this calculator.

#10 Guest_Frederick_*

Guest_Frederick_*
  • Guests

Posted 13 November 2010 - 09:39 PM

This is the Casio fx-81. Very interesting calculator. It has not statictics functions on the manual, however really exists on the calculator.
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key. :)



#11 Guest_Frederick_*

Guest_Frederick_*
  • Guests

Posted 13 November 2010 - 09:48 PM

This is the Casio fx-81. Very interesting calculator. It has not statictics functions on the manual, however really exists on the calculator.
All functions, which present on the fx-82 all present on the fx-81.
The ERROR sign on the FX-81 is the SD sign (statistics functions) on the fx-82 and mean not error but statistics mode. Of course, this ERROR sign can't be cleaned by AC key. :)


There's a catch: I think the stat functions are wrong.

I was given an fx-81 in high school in the 80's. Somewhere along the line I discovered the hidden functionality by comparing it with a friend's more advanced calculator (probably an 82). All through college I cleverly used the hidden stat functions in my lab classes. After graduation, one day when I was reading through (iirc) alt.folklore.computers, I got into a conversation about the fx-81. I talked about how I used its hidden stat functions, and then someone who had been involved in the production chimed in.. turns out, the initial run of the chip had a bug that made it miscalculate the stat results. Rather than tossing them, they used those chips to make a downgraded version of the calculator.

All that time I thought I was being clever by accessing the hidden capacity of my calculator .. but my results were subtly wrong.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users