
AFX 2.0+ vs ClassPad vs Ti-89 which one to buy?
#1
Posted 07 December 2003 - 01:29 PM
All my study-collegues have the ti-89 and I want to buy a Calculator too. But my old TI was just damn slow, too expensive and with nearly no functions. When I saw the FX of my Friend I throwed the TI away and was very happy until now. Now I would like to have some more features like a CAS and a graphic display. But instead of buying everything the others have I would like to know from whether anyone Could tell me anything about these three calculators.
The TI is a bit more expensive than the classpad and the classpad is a bit more expensive than the AFX.
So if i want to do nothing very spectacular would a AFX be enough?
What are the main differences between an AFX and TI?
What are the main differences between a classpad and AFX?
How about speed of these three?
A very nice feature of the TI is the measurements calculation. Is there something simular with the casio's?
What a defiinite requirement is, is matrix-calculations. Not the very big ones, but i need it.
Some more points that are important to me:
Calulating with complex numbers, and therefore Rectangle->Polar and vice-versa.
Some Physical constants.
Thanks in advance,
Karsten
#2
Posted 07 December 2003 - 02:07 PM
#3
Posted 07 December 2003 - 02:23 PM
By the way, is there anything useful with the algebra-tutor-mode?
#4
Posted 07 December 2003 - 03:44 PM
None of the Casio calculators have physical constants built in, allthough you can create them yourself.
As for measurement symbols, you wont find them in any Casio calculator (at present time) either.
With the Classpad (with a full greek symobol set) you can give your constants much more meaningful names than on the AFX.
TI CAS might still be a bit more advanced than the Classpad, but Casio seems to be working on it, and recently released an OS update.
The Classpad is also TONS FASTER for normal symbolic manipulation functions, although there have been some problems with slow list/matrix access (which I believe is partly fixed now)
If you don't need Cas the AFX is nice and cheap option.
If you need the most advanced Cas system out there, with unit calculations, superb 3d graph system, huge database of amatear program. Don't mind the price, and can accept a bit of slowness once in a while, the TI89 / Voyager200 is definetly your choice.
For anything else, I'de go with the Classpad.
The display is pretty big, and excelent for matrix input, however it might be a bit narrow when calculating big expressions.
Most calculations are real fast and effective, and the the touch screen with the whole 'drag and drop' feature is a bit sweet

The fact that it's priced cheaper than the TI89 is also a bit strange (allthough TI software is much more mateur), but certainly a pluss
Communiction between the CP and the PC is also very fast, through the USB interface, which is a big pluss for feature use of add-ins (for which you have over 4MB

All of these calculators have support for complex numbers. On the TI and the CP you also have additional symbolic manipulations of these (such a complex expand).. you have similar features in the AFX Cas module, but it's a bit a hazzle to have to leave the main app to do symbolic stuff.
With TI you have the so called 'Pretty print'. On the Classpad you can also input expression in this format, which is neat and sometimes even makes up for the lack of horizontal space
#5
Posted 07 December 2003 - 09:33 PM
#6
Posted 07 December 2003 - 09:59 PM
Classpad Manager [6.2MB]
There are a few fixes with the lates OS update (that isn't available on the manager) as well as a spreadsheet application
#7
Posted 07 December 2003 - 10:01 PM

----EDIT----
Bitwise beat me to it

Edited by Bob Vila, 07 December 2003 - 10:01 PM.
#8
Posted 07 December 2003 - 11:21 PM
What games can I play on it?
Can I use games from other calculators like the AFX?
Thanks, for all those information.
#9
Posted 07 December 2003 - 11:26 PM
Right now there aren't many games out for it..
Saltire however is releasing a Chip8 emulator for it "soon",.. that should give you a nice library of games to start off with.
Later, I'm hoping, we'll be able to develop "real" applications for it, and probably lots of games too

The CP is quite powerfull compared with other calculators, which opens doors for some pretty nifty games (once we get info enough to start developing)
#10
Posted 08 December 2003 - 01:11 AM

I can tell you that Casio and Saltire are supporting user developement (but dont ask me to elaborate, I cant), I suspect to see some major developements with the classpad in less than a month so now is a good time to get one. I also would like to invite you to the ClassPad part of this forum, you can find out anything you want to know there, including all the bad stuff and stuff that we have found lacking (and the great things we have figgured out).
#11
Posted 08 December 2003 - 03:21 AM
#12
Posted 08 December 2003 - 03:29 AM
#13
Posted 08 December 2003 - 11:24 AM
Gaming is not one of my Major arguments for buying any device I had yet. But it proofed to be very nice last Saturday, when we had a very long and very boring Session.
I heard that there are even some Graph applications for Game Boys.
#14
Posted 08 December 2003 - 05:22 PM
#15
Posted 08 December 2003 - 06:33 PM
In my uni we can use any device we want as long as it doesn't have any means of comunicating with the outside world
If you're working with applied mathematics, and not theory of mathematics, I see no reason you shouldn't be allowed to use the tools available out there.
#16
Posted 08 December 2003 - 06:40 PM

Unfortunately the US is suffering under an out of date education system which badly needs reform (not just about calcs).
#17
Posted 09 December 2003 - 08:21 AM

#18
Posted 09 December 2003 - 02:27 PM

#19
Posted 09 December 2003 - 04:36 PM

afx is good at exams

#20
Posted 09 December 2003 - 08:12 PM
#21
Posted 09 December 2003 - 11:12 PM
Unfortunately the US is suffering under an out of date education system which badly needs reform (not just about calcs).
yea, there are still a couple of math classes at my school that are still using ti-82's!!!
#22
Posted 09 December 2003 - 11:21 PM
It's when applying these methods (taken that you know how to do them by hand) a good calculator comes in handy.
#23
Posted 09 December 2003 - 11:47 PM
If you have a calculator you play with the values you get a much better feeling for graphs.
Or why not just try to integrate some functions to see what happens...
A teacher might say, hey, your Homework is to find a function that makes a smiley

But, back to topic, my Classpad is on its way ;-)
I'm a bit unsure about programming languages for it. Can I use assembly on it? Is there some documentation around it?
I know that I can program it in BASIC, but I'm proud that BASIC is one of these languages I was never able to program.
#24
Posted 09 December 2003 - 11:48 PM

one thing of note, since I started programming math functions into my calc I've become slightly better at math, i find myself recalling my own programs on test (if not for the numbers thing I'd be unstoppable at cards


---------EDIT---------
yuppi: you may misunderstand, its Casio BASIC, not the computer programming language BASIC

ASM will be possible, but we are waiting for some software from casio.
#25
Posted 09 December 2003 - 11:53 PM
Casio Basic is just a variation of basic.
Anyways, it's really simple. If you manage C/C++, ASM, Pascal or similar, you shouldn't have any problems with Casio Basic..
However, I have to agree with you.. Casio Basic is one of the languages I'm not particularly proud of knowing

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users