![Photo](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1c6b4d7ccc766c0901b966ec8dc3b0e1?s=100&d=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.casiocalc.org%2Fdot%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_images%2Fmaster%2Fprofile%2Fdefault_large.png)
My new CFX is broken!
#1
Posted 06 February 2004 - 05:25 PM
I was riding the bus the other day and saw a 5th grader playing with a CFX-9850GB+W. As I was getting off I saw one of his classmates with one on top of his books. Perhaps the school is issueing them to its elementary students. This seems a bit odd since in our school system we arent taught to add fractions until 6th grade.
#2
Posted 06 February 2004 - 05:49 PM
![:)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
my first casio graphing calc was a 9800, bought it about 7-8 years ago... in any case id leave negative feedback though lol
- dscoshpe -
#3
Posted 06 February 2004 - 07:13 PM
![:nonono:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/nonono.gif)
#4
Posted 06 February 2004 - 08:32 PM
man that sucks
the calc or the condition it's in?
![:P](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
#5
Posted 06 February 2004 - 09:39 PM
It has the best color screen ever for a CFX, looks as clear as the AFX B&W.
And it has some simple CAS commands.
Only downside is it's unbearable ugly looks.
#6
Posted 06 February 2004 - 10:10 PM
nota : does someone know the equivalent of 9970 in the french system ? 9960=65 9990=80 but we have nothing between 65 and 80 !
#7
Posted 06 February 2004 - 11:28 PM
#8
Posted 07 February 2004 - 05:44 AM
![:D](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
#9
Posted 07 February 2004 - 01:04 PM
According to personal experience, yes, a lot clearer.Is the 9970 screen a lot clearer than the 9850s?
On the other side, I've seen some horrible 9850s, not all, but some.
#10
Posted 07 February 2004 - 11:25 PM
![:P](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
#11
Posted 08 February 2004 - 09:52 AM
#12
Posted 09 February 2004 - 01:18 AM
#13
Posted 09 February 2004 - 07:51 PM
![:(](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png)
#14
Posted 09 February 2004 - 10:44 PM
#15
Posted 10 February 2004 - 09:50 AM
#16
Posted 13 February 2004 - 05:43 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users