
Dont want to loose programs
#1
Posted 03 June 2004 - 05:17 AM
#2
Posted 03 June 2004 - 05:39 AM
#3
Posted 03 June 2004 - 08:21 AM

#4
Posted 03 June 2004 - 08:56 AM
#5
Posted 03 June 2004 - 12:24 PM

#6
Posted 03 June 2004 - 03:48 PM
#7
Posted 03 June 2004 - 06:55 PM
(only possible on AFX) and it can be easily noticed.
This qualifys as cheating and could lead to your disqualification!!!
#8
Posted 03 June 2004 - 08:34 PM
Here i can use all i want on my graphic calculator. Teachers seems to be amazed watching me using the classpad. A lot of them think its a PDA.
#9
Posted 03 June 2004 - 08:36 PM

#10
Posted 04 June 2004 - 11:12 AM
Exactly... but isn't it possible to make a fake reset program/draw memory/picture? They don't pay that much attention!I wouldn't do this since they are not 100% real on CFX
(only possible on AFX) and it can be easily noticed.
This qualifys as cheating and could lead to your disqualification!!!
#11
Posted 06 June 2004 - 12:58 AM

#12
Posted 14 June 2004 - 09:06 PM

#13
Posted 15 June 2004 - 02:52 AM
(maybe)ha! they didnt even check to see what kind of calc you had! i could have "borrowed" qwerty's classpad and they wouldnt have even noticed (maybe
)

#14
Posted 15 June 2004 - 04:45 AM
Nope. We are better than you because we can solve these thingsaaahhh third world uni's.
Here i can use all i want on my graphic calculator. Teachers seems to be amazed watching me using the classpad. A lot of them think its a PDA.
without calculators! ALL OF THEM!
but ... well.. you're right it sucks.
And the best is. The new classes that get in form 8 the next year will
get a cas calculator. I heared that the teachers
were just testing some kind of TI calc with cas on it.
Maybe I sould recommend them the classpad?
#15
Posted 15 June 2004 - 04:56 AM

#16
Posted 15 June 2004 - 08:23 PM
Nope. We are better than you because we can solve these things
without calculators! ALL OF THEM!
Well i did reference to this coz here in my city (dunno on the big cities) nobody use graphic calculators, and a lot of people think that i'm playing tetris (when i'm using my AFX) or my classpad is a PDA. In my uni i had saw:
1- teacher with graphics calculators, TI and HP (he know a lot, very good teacher)
1- A guy with a TI-89 but he has died

1- A friend in his first uni year with a classpad
2- AFX of 2 guys of my classroom
1- CFX of another friend
1- TI Voyage of a guy in him first uni year.
Some of this guys bought their calculators when they saw me with my AFX.
#17
Posted 15 June 2004 - 08:29 PM
1 - AFX user (me)
1 - TI 89 (my best friend, tho he only bought the TI cos it was ?25)
1 - old Casio Graphic (the maths teacher, he knows nothing bout his calc)
#18
Posted 16 June 2004 - 10:57 AM
im sorry to say but u cant really do much
the same thing happened to me last year
and i had all these wiked games on
by the way i have a CFX-9850GB PLUS
so sorry mate but i think ur screwed
do u have a friend or sumfing u could borrow 1 off for the exam and swap them over or sumfing??

ne way good luck with ur exam
i have 2 tomorrow
and ive got a broken thumb!!

#19
Posted 18 August 2006 - 09:41 AM
Another thing, couldn't you send a screenshot of the reset screen to your PC via the calc and save it as a picture? Then just RclPict and your away! You could make a program to display the pic, then wait for Yes and display "Memory Cleared" EXACTLY as it is on the real reset menu.
Still, if your busted, your busted.
#20
Posted 18 August 2006 - 02:14 PM
I will talk from my own experience here.
I think that if it is pre-university (highschool - college or so) then you might be able to negotiate with your teacher about the programs. I succeded to keep most of my programs by claiming that I had made them myself and arguing that I already know the stuff that I have made programs for or else I wouldn't be able to code them up and then I briefly explained what the programs did and showed them to the teacher. That worked fine.
However at the university (at least my university) first of all, graphing calculators are more ore less banned (some courses make exceptions) and secondly, there are not teachers that supervise the exam. They just pop up occcasionally to answer questions. Thirdly, the tasks on the exam thesis are constructed so you can answer them without a calculator. If it says you can have a calculator, they almost alway refer to specific calculator models that can't be programmed.
If you have a calculator that contains a lot of good programs you can't download to your PC in time for the exam, then ask a fellow classmate if you can borrow his calculator. I've done that several times throughout my studies (often due to misplacing my own (accepted) calculator).
Faking a reset is daring and extremely foolish. If it is a small class or if the teacher supervises the exam, then you will lose his trust forever (in the best case). On a large university you will be reported to a disciplin council and risk being expelled from the school for a year or so, and that might mean loss of fundings and in the worst case you might end up on the street.
So ask a friend, carefully negotiate with your teacher or backup (write down/upload to PC) the programs you have should your previous options fail. That is my advice to you.
Now, good luck on that exam!!

#21
Posted 18 August 2006 - 08:01 PM

The consequences can be very nefast indeed (thanks for the dramatization scratty

However the consequences of using something and not getting caught are pretty good themselves, now, it's up to you to decide.
Except if you are in portugal since most teachers can't recognize a SD card, they can barely use the calculator for arithmetic purposes... after much trial and error.
Yet they are kindly tolerant to the use of graphing calculators... my math teacher once let a student use his laptop as calculator...

If you are in australia, you probably won't have acess to an 9860 SD only 9860 AU
In Brazil you are more likely not to recognize a SD card yourself, nevermind your teachers...
In china, vietnam and outstrikes... you could get military execution for copying in an exam, my guess: it's not worth it.
In the states, there are probably 300 difrent laws in each state that protect sudents who want to copy or cheat in their maths tests, so nevermind avoiding detection.
In japan you are most likely to achieve a better performance using your own head rather than a calculator, as you have 5- 6 times the processing capability of a calculator...
In the rest of the world, I don't really care
Now seriously, if you are not copying then show your teacher what each program does and how harmless they are... you may even resort into asking him/her to lend you his/her calculator
Else, you can atempt one of those programs and hope your teacher swallows the whole thing.
#22
Posted 18 August 2006 - 09:10 PM

In my country, teachers does'nt believe that a calculator of any brand (exept HP's) can be programmed.

#23
Posted 18 August 2006 - 09:13 PM
#24
Posted 18 August 2006 - 10:32 PM
Personally I think graphing calculators should be banned in class (yes, you heard me right). Sure they are good for understanding curves, tangents, secants and all that stuff. But I wonder if they don't spoil more than help in the end. A common handicap that can occur after some time of diligent calculator usage is that you eventually calculate the simplest arithmetics you can imagine without using your brain (been there). I think there's some true behind it when people call calculators a "brain prosthesis"

And concerning cheating, think of it this way: Would you like it when you have nailed the exam by studying real hard and you find out that a classmate has cheated on the exam and not has understood a thing of what it was about? How would you react to that? Another way you can think on the matter is that if you cheat without getting caught throughout your studies, wouldn't it be scary when you get a job and a salory they think you're worth, when you know that you can't peform the job that is required of you?
Now I sound like an uncool old dude with a beard and a kane (ok, let go for the beard, but I have no kane just yet

Sorry for ruining the good mode here

whee... I hate long posts, and I've just written one myself

#25
Posted 19 August 2006 - 02:45 PM
Firstly: You could do the modification here:
http://www.eow.ath.c...d=ram9850gbplus
Which will enable an extra 64K memory bank. (You'll need to borrow a PC-Calc cable to back everything up before you pull it apart) The two banks are seperate, and are switched between with a switch that you can hide in the backup battery area. Upload the programs back on to your calculator, switch off the calculator, switch memory banks, upload again, and when you go into your exam hand it over and let them do their thing. Once you take a seat, you just have to open up the battery compartment, flick the switch, and you will be able to use all the programs in the memory that wasn't erased.
[A cool extra touch would be to desolder the contacts for the data port, hot glue the data port back in place, then wire the two wires that would otherwise go to a hidden switch to the contacts on the jack, then superglue tin foil around the circumference of the rubber plug that goes into it. Once you sit down, just pull out the plug and drop it in your shit pocket. That's much more smooth than opening the batt. compartment!]
Another option:
You could write a program that clears the screen, and then goes into a loop testing for, say, F5. The screen will be blank (except for the thinking square) which the supervisor probably wont even notice after going through so many calculators. You then make the program act like the reset screen. I don't know how to do it but others have. The trick is, you have to open up your calculator, cut the traces around the reset button, and rewire them up to the contacts for F5. Before you walk in, execute the program and hand it over. When they press reset it will register as F5 to the calc, and the reset screen will come up. This is pretty pointless though, since if you are going to open up the calculator you may as well get an extra 64K of memory by doing the above modification.
#26
Posted 19 August 2006 - 04:27 PM
Fuc*** Sh** !!!! ROFL!!!! I'm laughing..so...so...hahahahaha!!!!!
. funny post Lord!
In my country, teachers does'nt believe that a calculator of any brand (exept HP's) can be programmed.
Thanks

now seriously scratty If you were still in school you would realize that cheating is most times the best option.
Because while you are copying the formulas etx to your calc you are momorizing them too...
And yes, it was quite a lecture thank you very much... I'll buy you a cane and lend you one of my pipes for that

#27
Posted 19 August 2006 - 08:30 PM

Yeah, I almost regret I said all that... but I felt there might be some guys out there who should here me out in this matter.
I would really hate to hear of talented calculator programmers that get caught due to cheating. The society needs good programmers!
And... sorry to say, IMHO you're quite wrong about cheating. Learning by programming stuff does by no way justify cheating, I might understand people think student allowance problems justifies cheating, but not learning, not by a long shot. Cheating is unfair and immoral, period.


Furthermore, it is IMHO even wrong to memorize formulas. You should learn to understand them, not memorize them


#28
Posted 19 August 2006 - 08:36 PM
And... sorry to say, IMHO you're quite wrong about cheating. Learning by programming stuff does by no way legitimize cheating, I might understand people think student allowance problems legitimizes cheating, but not learning, not by a long shot. Cheating is unfair and immoral, period. motz.gif smile.gif
Cheating is considered part of the american way of life.
Not cheating when you can is refusing using the intelligence and smartness god gave you...It is natural to atempt to improve your performance no matter the cost. I think it is your duty to yourself to cheat whenever you can

(actually I never cheated, I get a 20/20 at maths without studying or copying)
#29
Posted 19 August 2006 - 08:46 PM

There are smart cheaters and stupid cheaters. Smart cheaters get smarter whereas stupid cheaters don't. Unfortunately, I think there's a majority of the latter category :/.
#30
Posted 20 August 2006 - 06:05 PM

#31
Posted 23 August 2006 - 08:24 PM
No power plug.
No printer.
Max size : 21 cm by 15 cm

That's it.
Of course no transfer of data between 2 calcs during the test. No exchange of calc between students during the test.
The calc is not reset (I heard it is because your programs are considered as intellectual properties). Nothing in the memory has to be deleted. The content of the calc does not have to be controled.
However, the test is made according to this. You can't write just an answer, you have to detail everything. And the test is not multiple choice.
If for any subject the calc is forbidden, it has to be specified on the test sheet.
It is usually specified for the philisophy exam...

#32
Posted 23 August 2006 - 09:26 PM
To tell the truth however, I can't exactly recall how it was back in high-school for my part.
Oh. Well, then you could just as well bring a handwritten sheet of paper to the exam/testThe calc is not reset (I heard it is because your programs are considered as intellectual properties).

However, the test is made according to this. You can't write just an answer, you have to detail everything. And the test is not multiple choice.
If for any subject the calc is forbidden, it has to be specified on the test sheet.
That's how it is in my university as well. Either you're allowed to have a university-approved calculator, any calculator (very rare) or no calculator at all. Usually, when you're allowed to bring any calculator, you're also allowed to bring any books, papers or whatever you feel you need. These test are the hardest. So despite what one might think, no restrictions on an exam is not easier than those with restriction. back when I studied, I used to be very delighted when you had a course where on the exam you were only allowed to have a pen and a rubber. Those are the easiest exams! (generally speaking of course)
Hah! Funny note about the philosofy exams

#33
Posted 24 August 2006 - 12:52 AM
It is usually specified for the philisophy exam... biggrin.gif
Well not in my school, in phillosophy when the test subject was "logic" you were allowed to bring you graphing calculator(which is required in my school, really required, and not just any calc, it has to be a good Casio or Ti graphing calc no 7400's for us



#34
Posted 24 August 2006 - 04:44 PM
This gives me an idea. What about RF transmission through calculators? You plug the device in your 2.5mm socket in the calc and go to the LINK menu and just transfer the data. The device would be transceiver so it can receive and transmit. Also, with the device you could do multiplayer and play against other people on your calc! I think I have seen this done before, but I tried googling it and can't find it..........Of course no transfer of data between 2 calcs during the test. No exchange of calc between students during the test.
At my old school, Casio graphing calculators were forbidden. They were considered to advanced. TI were were accepted because they lacked features the Casio had:
Conics
Equation Solver: Simultaneous, Polynomials and equations in general
Financial and Buisness functions
An easy way to use matrices
The equation solving capabilities is the probably the biggest feature teachers hated at my school. We had this math time test once. There was 50 quadratic equation problems and we were given one hour to finish it. With my Casio, I just type in the equation and it would give me the answers. I was able to complete the test in less than 10 minutes and got every single answer correct. Everyone else, who was using TI, did not do so well on the test and half of them got a C or lower. However, the teacher got suspicious and the whole entire class grouped up against me and said a Casio was too powerful. The next day I wasn't allowed to use Casio and was told to go get a TI. I never did get a TI and I never again used a calculator again during my stay at that school. I still passed that class with a A.
#35
Posted 25 August 2006 - 12:16 AM
#36
Posted 25 August 2006 - 03:05 PM
Firstly: You could do the modification here:
http://www.eow.ath.c...d=ram9850gbplus
Thanks for the link. Now my CFX 9850 GB Plus has 64 K of RAM. When I find a nice, neat way to do it, I'll do the bank modification.
#37
Posted 25 August 2006 - 10:37 PM
This gives me an idea. What about RF transmission through calculators? You plug the device in your 2.5mm socket in the calc and go to the LINK menu and just transfer the data. The device would be transceiver so it can receive and transmit. Also, with the device you could do multiplayer and play against other people on your calc! I think I have seen this done before, but I tried googling it and can't find it..........
Nevermind, I found what I was looking for here: http://www.ticalc.or.../text/hardware/
Scroll down the page and look for Radio Transfer Link Plans which was done by Michael Jan. Once I get some money to buy some parts, I'll try to adapt it for Casio calculators and I'll share it with everyone on UCF.
#38
Posted 30 August 2006 - 07:30 AM
This is not possible in France, where you have to detail everything.There was 50 quadratic equation problems and we were given one hour to finish it. With my Casio, I just type in the equation and it would give me the answers. I was able to complete the test in less than 10 minutes and got every single answer correct.
You have to solve your equation on paper, not just write the answer.
What's the use of a calculator, then ? Check your answer, be sure the graph you drew on paper is coherent etc.
#39
Posted 30 August 2006 - 08:04 PM


#40
Posted 31 August 2006 - 04:18 AM
Well then, I wish that when you to the EQUA and type in a equation it would show the steps to how it came to a numerical conclusion. Then you could just copy down the steps onto the test and voila!
It would take a lot of code and programming for Casio to do this though........
I hope you are being sarcastic, as that is exactly what tutor, with CAS does.
AFX and classpad can do it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users