AFX or CFX
#1
Posted 24 June 2004 - 11:33 AM
i am just wandering which of the 2 types of calculators is better
feel free to give comments on which one is better and why and the pros and cons of both.
Mr Sparkle
#2
Posted 24 June 2004 - 11:43 AM
#3
Posted 24 June 2004 - 01:38 PM
i think the poll is kinda stupid. no one would say the CFX is better.
#4
Posted 24 June 2004 - 02:42 PM
#5
Posted 24 June 2004 - 03:54 PM
#6
Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:15 PM
#7
Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:42 PM
#8
Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:43 PM
#9
Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:47 PM
#10
Posted 24 June 2004 - 05:32 PM
#11
Posted 25 June 2004 - 06:44 AM
#12
Posted 25 June 2004 - 06:53 AM
i have cfx but from what i have heard so far AFX must be pretty good
does anyone have a screenshot of what it looks like please??
thanks
Mr Sparkle
#13
Posted 25 June 2004 - 07:07 AM
#14
Posted 25 June 2004 - 07:09 AM
For screenshot just look at this page: http://www.2072produ...to=page_afx.txt
#15
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:35 PM
#16
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:40 PM
#17
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:42 PM
2. Is ?63.95 a good price?
#18
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:44 PM
as for the price, how much is that in US$?
#19
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:46 PM
#20
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:48 PM
#21
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:48 PM
edit: looking at casio.com I see that they no longer sell AFX calcs! mabey that accounts for the rise in price.
#22
Posted 25 June 2004 - 02:49 PM
#23
Posted 25 June 2004 - 03:05 PM
#24
Posted 25 June 2004 - 03:21 PM
#25
Posted 25 June 2004 - 03:43 PM
#26
Posted 25 June 2004 - 04:34 PM
($60 buy it now)
that one comes with a cable if you dont have one already. if you do look at this one: http://cgi.ebay.com/...ssPageName=WDVW
($10 bid)
it is nessecary to have a cable with an AFX, or you lose much of its capabilities.
#27
Posted 25 June 2004 - 08:51 PM
#28
Posted 25 June 2004 - 09:06 PM
a huge Basic memory
faster
etc.
#29
Posted 25 June 2004 - 09:11 PM
#30
Posted 25 June 2004 - 10:13 PM
#31
Posted 26 June 2004 - 08:02 AM
#32
Posted 26 June 2004 - 11:37 AM
#33
Posted 26 June 2004 - 12:54 PM
But what is the point of having two names for the same product?
#34
Posted 26 June 2004 - 01:43 PM
#35
Posted 26 June 2004 - 05:40 PM
#36
Posted 01 July 2004 - 05:58 PM
#37
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:02 PM
#38
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:15 PM
#39
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:21 PM
#40
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:22 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users