Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

FX 1.0 PLUS and TI-86


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 zein

zein

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 24 February 2003 - 05:52 PM

Compare these calcs, what positives and negatives you can find? features and so on..

#2 CrimsonCasio

CrimsonCasio

    UCF Ambassador

  • [Legends]
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3579 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Interests:Claculators, Stephen King, Video Games, Calculators, Programming, Calculators, Reading, Calculators... hmm, what else... Ah! Calculators!

  • Calculators:
    Algebra FX2.0, CFX 9850Ga+, Classpad 300

Posted 24 February 2003 - 09:01 PM

The old debate, who is better TI or Casio, here is what I know:

TI 86:
Good things: ASM support, strings in programs, better naming for variables, more functions callable in programs, more widely used - thus its easyer to ask someone for help.
Bad Things: The programs (non ASM) on the Ti's run slower as time passes - making it good only for text based games, no main menu, lack of a CAS

Casio
Good Things: programs run at a consistant speed, icon menu, Add-ins, better display than Ti's, CAS, a lot of active programmers making new things.
Bad Things: No direct ASM support, CAS functions not useable in programs, one letter variables only, restricted amount of Lists and Matricies.

Personally I favor casio because it presents more of a challenge to programmers... and I'm hoping their future calcs will surpass Ti in every way. (I know, yeah right) :D

#3 BradN

BradN

    Casio Addict

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 25 February 2003 - 08:27 PM

On the FX 1.0 supporting ASM: It is supported in the sense that there is a official mechanism to allow running asm programs (unlike the TI-92 which relies on a backwards hack if memory serves). You just can't easily send programs between calculators - at this point it needs to be sent from a computer.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users