Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

The Best Graphic Calc Ever


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 11 July 2006 - 10:58 AM

Hi guys! I was looking for a new graphic Calculator to buy. Any suggestions??

#2 LordNPS

LordNPS

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Porto/Portugal (makes me sad having to write this but....) /Europe
  • Interests:CG<br />Programming<br />Chess<br />Weapons<br />Porn<br />Explosives and rocketry<br />Calculators<br />History( mainly WW2 history)<br />

  • Calculators:
    FX 9860 SD


Posted 11 July 2006 - 10:59 AM

9860 for sure, no doubt

#3 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 July 2006 - 11:02 AM

TI-89 Titanium

#4 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 11 July 2006 - 11:13 AM

Yes, at now, TI-89 Titanium. In future, TI nSpire CAS+.

#5 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 11 July 2006 - 01:04 PM

Ok guys Thanks for the replies. Can anyone enlighten on the difference between FX 2.0 and the new 9860G? Which one is better guys? Even 9850 with colour screen looks cool!

#6 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 11 July 2006 - 01:07 PM

No need color LCD. FX 2.0 is better.

#7 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 11 July 2006 - 01:13 PM

No need color LCD. FX 2.0 is better.

In what way is FX 2.0 better. I mean what FX 2.0 plus has that 9860G doesnt?

#8 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 11 July 2006 - 01:28 PM

FX 2.0 = CFX-9970G

#9 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 12 July 2006 - 04:20 AM

No, I don't like it.
It's no BEST.

#10 Guest_Sergei Frolov_*

Guest_Sergei Frolov_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 July 2006 - 04:33 AM

For example,

TI-89 can operate with long_name_variable such:

result = first1 * second3

On the fx-9860G you can only:

R = F * S

#11 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 12 July 2006 - 04:46 AM

okay I am still not sure. Can 9860G do algebra? It also lacks some of the applications which FX 2.0 has.

#12 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 12 July 2006 - 07:42 AM

FX-9860G is not CAS.

#13 vanhoa

vanhoa

    Casio Overlord

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vietnam

  • Calculators:
    AFX 2.0, CP 300, CP 330, nSpire, TI 89, FX 5800

Posted 12 July 2006 - 08:54 AM

At first I hope you please dont :D me or :profanity: if you see any not-right English on this :(

FX-9860G has Algebra ( the nature textbox I/O ) ! But it have no CAS!

I think it is not very useful for you if you are student. Else you will it very useful for your work with, at first, HI-SPEED CPU, the second,Spreadsheet and the third, E-activity.

If you are student, then I suggest you should make a choice: CP or TI.

Classpad is a very-easy-to-use calculator so you can evaluate what you want: CAS or Geometric and such on. It also have a large face that make us very-easy-to-watch and a pen that ve ry moden. But program on it is not good at all.

Ti is very good at program, we can do activties very fast with its buttons. And it is also very good at comunication with the cable goes with it. This is my problem because in my country I cant see a place to buy SB-87 so I must use my hand, that is a very terible job :banghead:

Ok, that is my opinion.

#14 R00KIE

R00KIE

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Electronics, games, programming

  • Calculators:
    HP49G ROM 1.24; CASIO CFX-9850GB PLUS;CASIO FX-6300G; CASIO FX-82TL

Posted 12 July 2006 - 09:52 AM

http://www.hydrix.co...qonos_tiles.jsp

#15 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 12 July 2006 - 10:17 AM

TI-89 Titanium is best choice. But in Vietnam... hix...

#16 LordNPS

LordNPS

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Porto/Portugal (makes me sad having to write this but....) /Europe
  • Interests:CG<br />Programming<br />Chess<br />Weapons<br />Porn<br />Explosives and rocketry<br />Calculators<br />History( mainly WW2 history)<br />

  • Calculators:
    FX 9860 SD


Posted 12 July 2006 - 09:22 PM

9860 is the Best calc in its class
9860 does not "lack" CAS, it is meant not to have CAS, it is not a failure or a bad charecteristic.
When you say "9860 doesn't have CAS" it gives the calc a bad conatation, it is harmful.
It is the best calc, the only reason it doensn't posesse CAS is because it would be unavailble for HighSchool, as it is required for calcs not to have CAS.
There's no other Calc, Ti or Casio that overgrows 9860 in any manner within a 100? class price (apart from CAS)
What you have to ask yourself is if you're willing to have a Calc (like Fx 2 or Ti 89 ) that is not ( I am sorry, I love AFx2 very much too, however it is the sad truth) nearly as fast as the 9860 (3x slower) in exchange for CAS.

#17 samuel

samuel

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

  • Calculators:
    CP300, FX-9860G, CFX-9850GB+, FX-991ES, AFX-2.0+

Posted 13 July 2006 - 04:46 AM

9860 is the Best calc in its class


I agree.

First you should decide on the types of features and functions you want out of your graphic calculator, and not decide on the brand first. This is like deciding your needs and budget for the car you want to buy, then go look for those models within your requirement.

Now I would put some requirement into perspective:

Firstly 9860 would be in the same class as the TI-84+ and perhaps HP9g or 39GII, since all these models do not have CAS and are allowed in most major examinations such as IB, Australia examination, AP, and so on. I

Price: surely 9860 and HP9g is at least 10 % cheaper than TI-84+

Speed: In this department both TI-84+ and 9860 are very much the same. Way better than HP9G definitely.

Special Features: While HP has a nice aplet feature, it is very complicated to use. the Casio 9860 eActivity is a very easy to use and powerful feature, if you know how to tap its power. No programming knowledge and formulation is required to create a eActivity. TI-84+ applet is very good too as long as you have good formulation knowledge to create a good applet.

I suppose the main attraction is the available memory of 1.5MB in the 9860. And if you think you want more power, you can get the 9860G SD model which allow the plug in of a SD card.

I have both AFX 2.0+ and 9860G, I can attest that 9860 is way faster than AFX.

Another class of calculator would be TI-89 series, ClassPad and HP 39G and so on. Of course, TI-89 and ClassPad are way much better than HP CAS calculator in terms of ease of use, function and design. Although, I know many engineers like to use HP graphics calc.

#18 vanhoa

vanhoa

    Casio Overlord

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 854 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vietnam

  • Calculators:
    AFX 2.0, CP 300, CP 330, nSpire, TI 89, FX 5800

Posted 13 July 2006 - 08:39 AM

So at all, 9860 is the best calc ?!?

I think the best calc folows your job and your favorite.

With program, Ti is the best and then 9860.
With math, Ti and CP is the best and then AFX.

But 9860 will good when you like it!

#19 caspro

caspro

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 216 posts

Posted 13 July 2006 - 12:25 PM

I've just got hold of a 9860 and a classpad.

The black-white contrast on the 9860 is miles better than any other calc.

All other casio calcs have very grey or green looking screens.

You have to see the clear 9860 screen to believe it.
The natural display input is a bit of a gimmick though, since all results are still numerical.

Having seen the amazing 9860 screen, I was disappointed to try the classpad and find the screen
was very hard to read ( yes, I tried adjusting the contrast), due to very small font as well
as grey-green screen.

If the classpad had the screen quality of the 9860 then that would really be something.

#20 Khỉ con

Khỉ con

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts

  • Calculators:
    TI-83, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, TI-92, TI Voyage 200, Casio FX-500MS, Casio FX-570ES, Casio FX-4500P, Casio FX-6300G, Casio CFX-9850GB Plus, Casio FX-9860G SD, Casio FX-9960G USB, Casio ClassPad 300

Posted 13 July 2006 - 01:01 PM

ClassPad 300 Plus, new high contrast display.
Posted Image

#21 caspro

caspro

    Casio Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 216 posts

Posted 13 July 2006 - 02:21 PM

ClassPad 300 Plus, new high contrast display.
Posted Image


Thanks for that.

Damn. If the Classpad 300 plus exists, why are they still selling the Classpad 300.

Is it as clear as the 9860 though ?

#22 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 13 July 2006 - 04:27 PM

Am currently preparing for SATs Exams i.e. SAT I Mathematics and SAT Subject Mathematics Level 1 and a graphical calculator is particularly useful. (We are not allowed to use calc in school so this only for sat). Any recommendations??

For those of you who dont know, the content of study is:
Number and operations; algebra and functions; geometryand Measurement (plane euclidean, coordinate, three dimensional, and trignometry); statistics, probability, and data analysis.

Acceptable Calculators
Calculators permitted during testing are:

graphing calculators
scientific calculators
four-function calculators (not recommended)

Unacceptable Calculators
Unacceptable calculators are those that:

use QWERTY (typewriter-like) keypads
require an electrical outlet
"talk" or make unusual noises
use paper tape
are electronic writing pads, pen input/stylus-driven devices, pocket organizers, cell phones, powerbooks, or handheld or laptop computers


I didnt mention this before to keep the topic unbiased.

#23 kucalc

kucalc

    Casio Maniac

  • [Legends]
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1422 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Interests:Programming: C/C++, Fortran, LISP, COBOL 85 Standard, PHP, x86 and SH3 Assembly

    Computer graphics

  • Calculators:
    fx-9860G / fx-7400G Plus / Algebra FX 2.0+ / fx-9770G / CFX-9850G / CFX-9850GB+ / TI-89 / TI-nSpire

Posted 13 July 2006 - 04:52 PM

Am currently preparing for SATs Exams i.e. SAT I Mathematics and SAT Subject Mathematics Level 1 and a graphical calculator is particularly useful. (We are not allowed to use calc in school so this only for sat). Any recommendations??

For those of you who dont know, the content of study is:
Number and operations; algebra and functions; geometryand Measurement (plane euclidean, coordinate, three dimensional, and trignometry); statistics, probability, and data analysis.


The fx-9860 can handle all of that. Especially with its natural textbook display, algebra would be easy. You could download the Geometry add-in from Casio's website and the fx-9860 has built in software for statistics and data analysis.

If you need a calc in a hurry and learn how to use it quickly for the test, get the fx-9860. The GUI menu makes its easy to use get comfortable easily than a TI calc.

#24 samuel

samuel

    Casio Fan

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

  • Calculators:
    CP300, FX-9860G, CFX-9850GB+, FX-991ES, AFX-2.0+

Posted 14 July 2006 - 05:08 AM

Am currently preparing for SATs Exams i.e. SAT I Mathematics and SAT Subject Mathematics Level 1 and a graphical calculator is particularly useful. (We are not allowed to use calc in school so this only for sat). Any recommendations??

In that case you should be looking at FX-9860G or TI-84+. Both are fast calculator and have the power for your study. Though 9860 can cost up to $15 less.

#25 Huz

Huz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

  • Calculators:
    none yet

Posted 14 July 2006 - 12:27 PM

Thanks But the loop hole here is that SAT allows Calculators with CAS. So the question is does having CAS really makes a difference or whether it is required (i have no prior knowledge of Graphic Calculators.)

Here let me give an example of a problem:

If f(x)= x^4 - 3x^3 - 9x^2 + 4, for how many real numbers k does f(k)=2?

a. none
b. one
c. two
d. three
e. four

can someone solve this? Does having CAS here provide added benefit?

#26 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:41 AM

No, in in the SAT II Math Level 1, you needn't a calculator at all. For level 2, the 9860g is sufficient. I, for one, got an easy 800 using the 9860, if that's a comfort to you.

Hope this helps.

Phil

#27 TomL_12953

TomL_12953

    Casio Addict

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 57 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malone, NY USA
  • Interests:Programmable calculators, BASIC computer language, Computers in general, Old movies and TV shows

  • Calculators:
    TI-59, TI-85, TI-86, TI-89, TI-89 Titanium, Radio Shack EC-4026, Algebra FX 2.0 Plus, HP-35s, Compucorp 326 Scientist, Durabrand 828, fx-9860G II SD

Posted 19 July 2006 - 12:08 PM

Thanks for that.

Damn. If the Classpad 300 plus exists, why are they still selling the Classpad 300.

Is it as clear as the 9860 though ?


It could be that they have a large inventory of the older one to clear out. If you look at the prices, the older one is cheaper than the Plus version now.

Tom Lake




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users