Grayscales are another problem too but I think it can be fixed. But is it really a good idea?
Mlc On Classpad
Started by
Kilburn
, Sep 29 2006 04:59 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 29 September 2006 - 04:59 PM
I recently heard about MLC, and I was thinking about building a MLC interpreter for ClassPad. As the language seems to be very simple, it should not be hard to implement. Grayscales are another problem too but I think it can be fixed. But is it really a good idea?
Grayscales are another problem too but I think it can be fixed. But is it really a good idea?
#2
Behnoud
-
- Members
-
- 338 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:Iran
-
Calculators:
CP 300+ OS2.2/
FX 3600 pv/
FX 115 s/
FX 602P
Posted 29 September 2006 - 06:02 PM
Dear kilburn
Please explain more about MLC.
If it's easy enough so it is good to be implemented an developed for CP!
Please explain more about MLC.
If it's easy enough so it is good to be implemented an developed for CP!
#3
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 30 September 2006 - 07:31 AM
It's a programming language made do work on TI 83, 86 and AFX, especially for games. It's should run very fast, and implement grayscales. As it uses only short integers and not double, it should run much faster than Lua (if I make a correct interpreter) 
#4
vanhoa
-
- Members
-
- 854 posts
Casio Overlord
- Gender:Male
- Location:Vietnam
-
Calculators:
AFX 2.0, CP 300, CP 330, nSpire, TI 89, FX 5800
Posted 30 September 2006 - 10:08 AM
You will make it?
#5
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 30 September 2006 - 01:29 PM
If it's neither impossible nor useless, I'll make it. 
#6
The_AFX_Master
-
- [Legends]
-
- 519 posts
Casio Overlord
- Gender:Male
- Location:Black Mesa Research Facility (sector C)
- Interests:BASIC +FORTRAN 90+ C++.....and HALF LIFE
-
Calculators:
Casio Algebra FX 2.0 Plus, Casio fx 570 ms, Classpad 300, And a crowbar
Posted 30 September 2006 - 03:41 PM
As the language seems to be very simple, it should not hard to implement.
If Huhn_m read this, would:
you! 
#7
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 30 September 2006 - 05:12 PM
Hey, I told "It should not be hard to implement", not "It MUST not be hard to implement" 
Anyway, someone told me that huhn_m had some difficulties with strings... for example
Anyway, someone told me that huhn_m had some difficulties with strings... for example
#8
Orwell
-
- Members
-
- 777 posts
Casio Overlord
- Gender:Male
- Location:Paris - France
-
Calculators:
Casio AFX 1.02 / Casio ClassPad 300
Posted 01 October 2006 - 08:28 AM
Just read some posts in the MLC sub-forum
#9
huhn_m
-
- [Legends]
-
- 1957 posts
Casio Maniac
- Gender:Male
- Location:Germany / Dresden
-
Interests:Assembler(!!!)
Computers and Programming
Operating Systems
Programmable Calculators
Maths and everything arround it -
Calculators:
FX-82SX / AFX 2.0+ (ROM 1.03) / FX 1.0+ (ROM 1.03)
Posted 19 November 2006 - 01:47 PM
hey guys
You could have told me about this. I'm not a regular visitor of this sub-forum (yet).
Actually it should be easier to implement than on the AFX since the CP has way more power. It should be possible to write the whole thing in C without loosing the speed.
However, I'm still fighting with the (IMO) difficult way to programm the CP.
If I figure it out I'll implement MLC2 for it up to the level the AFX version is supposed to be on in december (conditional statements and keyboard support will be added soon). I will then open an extra topic over in the MLC2 forum for the CP version.
If anyone can point me to an EASY guide to programming the CP for C++ noobs (with quite some experiences in ASM, C, Pascal/Delphi) it would be really nice. The explanation in the SDK seems quite difficult to me and it will take me some time to get used to the way this device is programmed. I would much prefer to programm for it in ASM but I guess there is no SDK for doing this.
Anyways, thanks
You could have told me about this. I'm not a regular visitor of this sub-forum (yet).
Actually it should be easier to implement than on the AFX since the CP has way more power. It should be possible to write the whole thing in C without loosing the speed.
However, I'm still fighting with the (IMO) difficult way to programm the CP.
If I figure it out I'll implement MLC2 for it up to the level the AFX version is supposed to be on in december (conditional statements and keyboard support will be added soon). I will then open an extra topic over in the MLC2 forum for the CP version.
If anyone can point me to an EASY guide to programming the CP for C++ noobs (with quite some experiences in ASM, C, Pascal/Delphi) it would be really nice. The explanation in the SDK seems quite difficult to me and it will take me some time to get used to the way this device is programmed. I would much prefer to programm for it in ASM but I guess there is no SDK for doing this.
Anyways, thanks
#10
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 19 November 2006 - 03:15 PM
You can program in ASM, but it's different. If I remember, the ASM for AFX is A68k, while the CP ASM is SH-3. And there is no simpler documentation than the one provided in the CPSDK. 
#11
Guest_ClassPad_*
Guest_ClassPad_*
-
- Guests
Posted 21 November 2006 - 03:47 AM
You can program in C using the SDK.
#12
Kilburn
-
- Members
-
- 491 posts
Casio Technician
- Gender:Male
- Location:France
- Interests:Blah
-
Calculators:
FX-7500 G
ClassPad 300
Posted 22 November 2006 - 02:21 PM
Interesting... I didn't know that 
Btw, nice nickname
Btw, nice nickname
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
