![Photo](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9201f2dcac34450e370310eff6a6b657?s=100&d=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.casiocalc.org%2Fdot%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_images%2Fmaster%2Fprofile%2Fdefault_large.png)
Getting A New Casio Calculator
#1
Posted 29 August 2007 - 10:33 PM
EDIT: Sorry if this is in the wrong forum
#2
Posted 29 August 2007 - 10:46 PM
![:D](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
If you don't need another calculator with CAS, go with the fx-9860G. Simply the best, fastest, non-CAS graphing calculator ever built. You can program in C or Assembly with it also and a number of people use it here. It comes in a couple of variants:
* fx-9860G - The "vanilla flavor" + 1.5MB built-in flash + High contrast display + USB port + fast processor
* fx-9860SD - The fx-9860G + SD memory card slot (up to 1GB storage)
* fx-9860G Slim - Portable, clamshell design, with backlight display. Resembles a bit like a Nintendo DS.
#3
Posted 29 August 2007 - 11:12 PM
Thanks for the suggestion.
![:)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
EDIT: The C SDK for the Fx-9860 is free...right?
#4
Posted 30 August 2007 - 04:55 AM
Hmmm...I'm unable to decide between the fx-9860SD and the fx-9860G Slim. I'm leaning more towards the fx-9860SD, though.... if only there were a fx-9860G Slim with a SD memory card slot....
Ah yes, it is a hard decision.
EDIT: The C SDK for the Fx-9860 is free...right?
Yes, free for fx-9860G owners.
#5
Posted 30 August 2007 - 05:26 AM
I think I'm actually going to go with the fx-9860g slim. Are there any online stores you would know of that sell the fs-9860g cheaply (preferably unused)? I don't think any of the stores around where I live carry it. Oh, and one more thing - the SDK is Windows-only, right? I'd prefer to program on my <{GNULINUX}> computer, but maybe it will work with WINE if it's Windows-only. I don't mind too much if it's Windows-only, though, just saying....
#6
Posted 30 August 2007 - 05:34 AM
The fx-9860G SDK is for Windows though. I believe it's still usable under WINE.
#7
Posted 30 August 2007 - 07:13 PM
![:P](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
#8
Posted 31 August 2007 - 04:04 AM
- I want to see how the TI-Nspire turns out
- Casio seems to be making a lot of cool calculators, and I want to see what it does in response to the TI-Nspire
- My parents won't let me get another calculator, even if I pay for it. (This is the main reason - they think I have too many calculators)
I appreciate your help, and hopefully within a few years, I'll be able to get a Casio graphing calculator.
#9
Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:22 AM
![:)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
The TI-nSpire looks really great. Even if the TI-nSpire doesn't support programming, I'm pretty sure that someone in the TI community could hack it.
- My parents won't let me get another calculator, even if I pay for it. (This is the main reason - they think I have too many calculators)
Yeah same with me! (Well, except I can't pay anything) And I'm not talking about my graphing calculators, I also own a couple of scientifics and four functions.
#10
Posted 31 August 2007 - 03:00 PM
- has a bigger screen;
- has a higher contrast;
- is much faster;
- supports Add-Ins (the other one doesn't);
- and supports SD cards (If it's the SD version).
#11
Posted 03 September 2007 - 06:27 PM
![:)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
Does anybody know if there are rumors or anything about any new calculators Casio plans to release?
#12
Posted 03 September 2007 - 07:50 PM
Hey bfr.
Here's what I suggest:
If you don't need another calculator with CAS, go with the fx-9860G. Simply the best, fastest, non-CAS graphing calculator ever built. You can program in C or Assembly with it also and a number of people use it here. It comes in a couple of variants:
* fx-9860G - The "vanilla flavor" + 1.5MB built-in flash + High contrast display + USB port + fast processor
* fx-9860SD - The fx-9860G + SD memory card slot (up to 1GB storage)
* fx-9860G Slim - Portable, clamshell design, with backlight display. Resembles a bit like a Nintendo DS.
What? This is an easy decision...
![:D](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
fx-9860G Slim all the way! Go for the "coolness" factor -- clamshell with backlight.
![^_^](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/happy.png)
![;)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/wink2.gif)
#13
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:18 AM
Does anybody know if there are rumors or anything about any new calculators Casio plans to release?
CASIO just released the ClassPad 330. You may want to take a look at it.
@Ranman: I guess you're right.
![:D](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
Calculators:
Casio FX-6300G
Tandy PC7
Wait a second, you own a CASIO fx-6300G.... and a Tandy PC7?!?!
![^_^](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/happy.png)
#14
Guest_GuestSe_*
Posted 05 September 2007 - 08:53 PM
#15
Guest_GuestSe_*
Posted 06 September 2007 - 12:26 AM
#16
Posted 06 September 2007 - 09:49 AM
What if people want MOAR MEMORY? Then they'd choose the SD version.fx-9860G Slim all the way! Go for the "coolness" factor -- clamshell with backlight. The SD slot is overrated.
#17
Posted 07 September 2007 - 02:21 AM
Hi everyboy, i need the qr algorithm for the afx 2.0, i search that on internet, but there's nothing about it.....
I don't think the AFX has a built-in program that implements the QR algorithm. I'm no expert on this, but there are less complex ways of finding eigenvalues than the QR algorithm. Take a look here: http://en.wikipedia....value_algorithm.
But E_net4 is right. I would suggest that you register for a account here and start a thread on it. That way you may be able to get more replies.
#18
Guest_Qwerty.55_*
Posted 08 October 2010 - 07:39 PM
CASIO's have had color for a long time.
The TI-nSpire looks really great. Even if the TI-nSpire doesn't support programming, I'm pretty sure that someone in the TI community could hack it.
We're still jealous of the color thing. Perhaps the new Prizm will convince TI to make a color calc...
Anyway, you can actually program the nSpire fairly easily. The problem is that TI locked the keyboard from OS run programs, so you have to use compiled C or one of the other languages to access any of the useful processor routines. It's quite a pain from what I understand, although I myself work with the 83+/84+ series (using TI's version of BASIC, Assembly, and another language called Axe).
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users