Hi my friends.
i need some program for fx 5800 , for relate with extra variable. can i have A[#] or m[#] other than Z[#]
and Can I have a Array for example A[1,3]

Casio Fx,5800
Started by
NavidCal
, Jan 03 2009 04:06 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 January 2009 - 04:06 PM
#2
Posted 07 January 2009 - 02:39 AM
I don't think so. The fx-5800 has a pretty limited memory.
#3
Posted 07 January 2009 - 08:39 PM
It's possible to use the 6 matrices Mat A-F in a program as two dimensional arrays.
The only indexed variable is Z, but you can have more arrays by adding an offset to
the index of Z.
The only indexed variable is Z, but you can have more arrays by adding an offset to
the index of Z.
#4
Guest_CASUS_*
Posted 22 April 2010 - 04:56 PM
Yes, you can "misuse" the statistic variables as a three dimensional field, accessible by LIST X{n}, LIST Y{N} and LIST Freq{n}
Advantages:
Values are editable after input
Values don't depend on statistic relevant functions
Disadvantages:
Only 199 threedimensional fields are available
All fields must be filled sequentially (ascending from 1 to 199) by a program
Any real numbers, but no complex numbers are possible
Together with the Z[n] field you can build a four dimensional field.
For example, to retrieve the highest index of the 3D field simply switch to "FreqOff" in the option menu and get "n" from the statistic variables.
I prefer the statistic data field rather than the "DimZ" method because I'm able to access each value separately in a convenient way.
Regards.
Advantages:
Values are editable after input
Values don't depend on statistic relevant functions
Disadvantages:
Only 199 threedimensional fields are available
All fields must be filled sequentially (ascending from 1 to 199) by a program
Any real numbers, but no complex numbers are possible
Together with the Z[n] field you can build a four dimensional field.
For example, to retrieve the highest index of the 3D field simply switch to "FreqOff" in the option menu and get "n" from the statistic variables.
I prefer the statistic data field rather than the "DimZ" method because I'm able to access each value separately in a convenient way.
Regards.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users