New Moderating staff!!
#1
Posted 18 April 2003 - 02:24 PM
What you see here is a list of the people suggested for being and admin.
You are free to choose the one you see fits, but please, no one should tell another to vote for so or so, just vote for yourself according to their behaviour.
Also if you don't know whom to vote to, then you might vote a Null Vote.
Some important notes:
1- The top 3 voted are going to be moderators for some time (maybe a month) to evaluate thier behaviour, then they'll be made admins if they prove trusty.
2- The poll will remain for a week (or less if all people voted quickly), then decisions will be taken.
3- If anything goes wrong with this poll, admins will vote for the top 3 they want.
4- If you are going to post here by for any reason, then don't offend any of the other members.
5- Members who will get a low number of votes, don't feel sad, this doesn't mean you're bad, it just means that thier are others who might be better.
Thanks everyone for attention, and please if you didn't notice take a look at the Warning post, some modifications took place.
#2
Posted 18 April 2003 - 02:36 PM
(if you can't tell I'm being sarcastic, simon's a cool guy)
are the new admin going to replace the old, inactive ones like farmboy, or will they just be added to the list.
#3
Posted 18 April 2003 - 02:47 PM
Just to let you (and others) know, Simon believes in democracy very much, whatever he wants to do he asks others, so don't really take notice of his threats (you know, living in both Russia and US had a very badd effect on him).
You would also sense this democracy if you become a moderator soon.
Just make yourself (and other moderators too) ready for being a dictator, and say you are not.
P.S. Don't reply to this post here, don't go off-topic.
#4
Posted 18 April 2003 - 05:34 PM
#5
Posted 18 April 2003 - 05:36 PM
#6
Posted 18 April 2003 - 05:48 PM
I think you should leave this stuff to the more experienced.
I prefer
BiTwhise (because of his ASM knowledge) and
2072 (because of his C knowledge).
They would be a good addition to the member team.
#7
Posted 18 April 2003 - 05:53 PM
also its good to have admin in diffrent time zones, that way there isnt a time of day when no help is availible.
#8
Posted 19 April 2003 - 10:13 AM
now it's not a secret ballet
how many new moderating staff will there be??
(chanting in whisper: 4, 4, 4, ...)
#9 Guest_Bytefish Productions_*
Posted 19 April 2003 - 10:23 AM
#10
Posted 19 April 2003 - 10:55 AM
I really like quoting what already has been said, rj[i]1- The top 3 voted are going to be moderators for some time (maybe a month) to evaluate thier behaviour, then they'll be made admins if they prove trusty.
Please read more carefully
#11
Posted 19 April 2003 - 05:40 PM
Killer?
THanks,
Simon
#12
Posted 19 April 2003 - 07:10 PM
#13
Posted 19 April 2003 - 08:57 PM
If i had known about this poll, i would probably have posted something in the free discussion forum about "why you should vote for me" a fedw days before it went up
#14
Posted 19 April 2003 - 09:09 PM
Your replies and how you handle questions in the forum should be indication enough for ppl to vote ..
#15
Posted 19 April 2003 - 09:10 PM
#16
Posted 19 April 2003 - 09:13 PM
So rj's request is considered, he has a one vote to be considered.
rj: Sorry, but this have been discussed for a long time and with deep thoughts between admins, and that's the final decision, more than 3 moderators for such a small forum is not necessary (of course that's not the only reason), so please consider this poll as it is is a final decision.
#17
Posted 19 April 2003 - 10:00 PM
HAHHAh..im just kidding killer, i Just wanted to mess with you...like I always do!
Enjoy,
Simon
#18
Posted 20 April 2003 - 02:02 AM
my idea: go spend a couple of thousand dollars advertising the UCF for you, to expand from 200 members to 2000 members
but i'm not gonna do it. I'm not that desperate to become an admin.
my other idea: create some new users and vote as them, but i'm not gonna do that either.
If five or six people with no posts go and vote for me you'll know, so i won't do that.
#19
Posted 24 April 2003 - 12:42 AM
#20
Posted 24 April 2003 - 09:49 AM
#21
Posted 24 April 2003 - 08:41 PM
#22
Posted 26 April 2003 - 09:45 AM
But I don't really mind about who is going to be admin as long as he/she/it does his job well
#23
Posted 26 April 2003 - 01:02 PM
i want to have a say in how this forum is run, all that.
it looks like i'm not gonna win. when's the next round of voting?
#24
Posted 26 April 2003 - 01:04 PM
hehe, rj you really got to read the posts...If you dont make it this time.. Im sure we will have another round in a few months. Anyone that wants to prove themselves worthy still has a chance. Its not anythign personal, and we dont want it to be..that is why we enabled the poll. I have nothing against anyone here at this forum, well..er.. except Killer83Z
#25
Posted 26 April 2003 - 01:06 PM
#26
Posted 27 April 2003 - 05:22 PM
New moderators:
1- BiTwhise
2- 2072
3- CrimsonCasio
After a test period they should be qualified to become administrators, right now they have all post moderation access, Moderator forum access, and some new toys.
Congratulations.
P.S. I was away the past week 'coz my PC broke down, seems to take some time, so I'll be away most of the time, maybe I'll come back again next week or so.
Wish me good luck.
*edit*
Umm, I re-opened the thread in case you'd like to congratulate the new mods.
Edited by Mohamed, 27 April 2003 - 05:51 PM.
#27
Posted 27 April 2003 - 06:04 PM
And, Congrats to 2072 and Crimson
#28
Posted 27 April 2003 - 10:31 PM
#29
Posted 27 April 2003 - 11:28 PM
I'd like to take this time to thank everyone here: thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you...
hehe, got to get to work looking at these new options...
#30
Posted 28 April 2003 - 06:15 AM
#31
Posted 28 April 2003 - 08:29 AM
oh well.
congrats crimson, bitwise and 2072
i can't wait till the next round of voting.
#32 Guest_Bytefish Productions_*
Posted 28 April 2003 - 08:35 AM
#33
Posted 28 April 2003 - 11:20 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users