I tried to integrate cos(x)^-2 from 0 to pi/4 but the result was MA error.
It is interesting because much cheaper model fx-991 es plus gave me the correct answer which is 1.
The equation can be seen here
https://www.taschenr...KIPRO_gross.jpg
the OS is version 2.00, the angle was set to RAD.
Fx-9860G Slim Integration Bug
Started by
pan.gejt
, Dec 11 2013 03:56 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
pan.gejt
-
- Members
-
- 263 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Male
- Location:CZ
-
Calculators:
.
Posted 11 December 2013 - 03:56 PM
#2
shinolife63
-
- Members
-
- 25 posts
Newbie
- Gender:Male
-
Calculators:
Classpad CP-400
Classpad CP-330
fx-9860gii
Hacked fx-9750gii
fx-300 ES plus
fx-115 ES
fx-300 MS
Posted 11 December 2013 - 10:00 PM
I tried on my hacked 9750gii Os 2, It resulted in Math Error as well, but when you do ( cos(x) ) ^ -2 It results in the correct answer 1
What your calc thinks your trying to do without the extra parenthesis is:
cos (x^-2)
What your calc thinks your trying to do without the extra parenthesis is:
cos (x^-2)
#3
pan.gejt
-
- Members
-
- 263 posts
Casio Freak
- Gender:Male
- Location:CZ
-
Calculators:
.
Posted 12 December 2013 - 05:17 AM
Thanks, using of the 2nd set of parenthesis solved this problem.
But the basic question remains (at least for me), why is the behavior of 9860g and 991es plus so different.
But the basic question remains (at least for me), why is the behavior of 9860g and 991es plus so different.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
