Casio Kingdom is still a html site
#1
Posted 30 October 2003 - 02:14 PM
Please visit my new site and tell me what you think. The whole design is almost completely different.
Casio Kingdom :D
#2
Posted 30 October 2003 - 02:25 PM
My site doesn't need anything more advanced than html.
Even the links in my site directly refer to Geocities, not to the home folder as it should, and that's wat I'm working on to move it to Crimson's host!
BTW: Anyone know how can I automatically re-direct people to my new site?
#3
Posted 30 October 2003 - 02:27 PM
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="x;URL=http://www.my.com">replace the x with time you want to wait until redirecting.
#4
Posted 30 October 2003 - 02:27 PM
it is a nice site, better than your last (no offence) but i would put the content in an iframe, if you need help with this just ask, its how my site is done, the only problem is mine will only fit in a window that is 1024 x 768, though it can be made to fit in smaller, it was just personal preference.
so iframe it and it will be amasing
then you will only need decent content.................J/K
#5
Posted 30 October 2003 - 02:30 PM
#6
Posted 30 October 2003 - 03:03 PM
Good:
you can have a window in a window that is scrollable
you can chage content in the Iframe quickly without refreshing the rest of your page
they can be absolute postioned
sites designed around them (like andys) are generally quite good looking
Bad:
unsupported by all browsers
can be problematic to viewers scrolling
you cant go to a page that would normally be contained in a Iframe and have the Iframe and content appear arround it (you would have to send vistors to the main page of your site no matter what)
its really a personal prefrence, I think they only work if used well and effectivly, but I've stoped using them because of browser problems, my last site had one and many people had problems viewing it.
#7
Posted 30 October 2003 - 03:10 PM
#8
Posted 30 October 2003 - 06:41 PM
#9
Posted 30 October 2003 - 06:43 PM
#10
Posted 30 October 2003 - 06:58 PM
#11
Posted 30 October 2003 - 07:00 PM
#12
Posted 30 October 2003 - 07:02 PM
Good points.I have some problems with IFrames, I've used them quite a bit and I feel I know the good points and bad so listen to this:
Good:
you can have a window in a window that is scrollable
you can chage content in the Iframe quickly without refreshing the rest of your page
they can be absolute postioned
sites designed around them (like andys) are generally quite good looking
Bad:
unsupported by all browsers
can be problematic to viewers scrolling
you cant go to a page that would normally be contained in a Iframe and have the Iframe and content appear arround it (you would have to send vistors to the main page of your site no matter what)
its really a personal prefrence, I think they only work if used well and effectivly, but I've stoped using them because of browser problems, my last site had one and many people had problems viewing it.
I'm only using iframes when I can't get an other way.
Old browser won't accept them.
You are able to load different pages in a iframe by for example using the GET-method in php. You will then get an url such as www.mysite.com/index.php?frame=page.html.
In javascript this is also possible I mean, but it's difficult.
But why do you need to use iframes?
I like it so, and there's nothing to be changed.
#13
Posted 30 October 2003 - 07:15 PM
hmm, read, everyone has their own oppinion/preferencesvalid points crimson but i like my iframes , they may not be suitable for every one tho
#14
Posted 30 October 2003 - 07:18 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users