Classpad 400
#1
Posted 21 September 2005 - 04:07 PM
#2
Posted 21 September 2005 - 04:58 PM
Definitely no. Window$ XP is a mega-virus. But even if you like it (shame to you!), XP needs more than 256 Mb RAM just to boot. Fortunately, your imaginary "ClassPad 400" will never become a real calc.Do you like it???
#3
Posted 22 September 2005 - 12:35 PM
#4
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:25 PM
Totally agree. In this "ClassPad" the "delete" key is present, but unfortunately the "ctrl" and "alt" keys are missing, so it cannot run window$how can you even think to use windows without ctrl and alt key???
#5
Posted 23 September 2005 - 03:22 AM
#6 Guest_Guest_*
#7
Posted 24 September 2005 - 05:30 PM
Small pc or not, it runs Window$. No, thanks.
#8
Posted 24 September 2005 - 05:35 PM
#9 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 03 October 2005 - 07:08 PM
Do you like it???
Why don't you buy a handheld ???
#10 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 03 October 2005 - 09:13 PM
www.oqo.com
#11 Guest_rh_*
Posted 06 October 2005 - 12:41 PM
Definitely no. Window$ XP is a mega-virus. But even if you like it (shame to you!), XP needs more than 256 Mb RAM just to boot. Fortunately, your imaginary "ClassPad 400" will never become a real calc.
Oh contraire. XP will boot just fine with 128 MB of RAM. We do it everyday in my classroom.
#12
Posted 06 October 2005 - 02:11 PM
#13
Posted 06 October 2005 - 04:39 PM
Yes, it works with 128 Mb, but it will boot in 5 minutes, and it will be slow, slow, and slow. It works, in the sense that you can use the vulnerable Internet Explorer, maybe you will be able to write a simple document in Word (no equations, no images, only a few pages), or you can use a simple spreadsheet, and... that's all. But the most important is that to do (slowly) all these "amazing" things, you have to pay, to pay, and to pay. No, thanks.Oh contraire. XP will boot just fine with 128 MB of RAM. We do it everyday in my classroom.
#14
Posted 06 October 2005 - 05:02 PM
Yes, maybe you can boot with as little as 128M (and Nanard was able to boot on only 64M!), but even Microsoft suggests 256M. With anything less the OS will be swapping virtual memory to the hard drive and it will crawl. If you only have 128M I'd suggest using Windows 2000. Less than that and I'd use Windows 98. If you have an old computer with a slow hard drive and only want to use the Internet you might even consider Windows 95.... or spend $200 on a new budget PC and put <{GNULINUX}> on it.Oh contraire. XP will boot just fine with 128 MB of RAM. We do it everyday in my classroom.
I like the idea of a color screen on the ClassPad...
#15
Posted 06 October 2005 - 06:18 PM
Source: http://www.winsupers...review_2005.aspHere are Microsoft's Windows Vista hardware recommendations:
Desktop CPU: 3 GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor with Hyper-Threading Technology 530 (or higher) or 3 GHz Intel Xeon processor with 2 MB L2 cache, or AMD Athlon 64, Sempron, or Opteron 100, 200, or 800 processor, single or dual-core versions.
Mobile CPU: 1.86 GHz Intel Pentium M processor 750 (or higher), or AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology, Mobile Sempron, or Mobile Athlon 64 processor.
Memory: 512 MB of RAM or more, all platforms.
At WinHEC 2005, Microsoft did reveal a vague set of specifications for PCs that will run Windows Vista, and provide the advanced Aero Glass interface. A modern Pentium 4-based PC (or the AMD equivalent) with 512 MB of RAM and a dedicated graphics card capable of DirectX 9.0 compatibility will run Windows Vista just fine, I was told. Systems with fewer graphical resources--like most notebook computers and systems with Celeron processors--will default to the low-end Aero Express user interface, Microsoft says.
#16
Posted 06 October 2005 - 08:01 PM
Why CASIO don't release PocketPC version emulator?
#17
Posted 06 October 2005 - 08:16 PM
Casio sells calculators. Does it make sense to make a PocketPC version that will only take away ClassPad sales?It would be nice if I could run Classpad applications on my PocketPC!!
Why CASIO don't release PocketPC version emulator?
#18
Posted 09 October 2005 - 08:16 PM
#19
Posted 14 October 2005 - 10:57 PM
#20
Posted 14 October 2005 - 11:45 PM
WinXP will crash only if you have a hardware problem or wrong/bad drivers installed.
#21
Posted 15 October 2005 - 12:46 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users