![Photo](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0eae5001ac5e9efd00aa1c5b4ff0e96?s=100&d=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.casiocalc.org%2Fdot%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_images%2Fmaster%2Fprofile%2Fdefault_large.png)
New Version Of Laplace_ilaplace Program
#1
Posted 07 March 2006 - 12:44 PM
it is downloadable at
hapdownload.persiangig.com --> downloads --> calculator staff --> casio --> Laplace & lnvert laplace 1.0
download it
send me bugs mortezahaydari AT yahoo.com
#2
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:49 AM
Greetings.
#3
Posted 08 March 2006 - 08:26 AM
#4
Posted 08 March 2006 - 08:57 AM
i can translate it to lua but i think that lua is not good enough
#5
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:51 PM
Wrong. Every program written in CP Basic will be faster if implemented in CPLua. Furthermore, CPLua allows structural programming (true function support, recursive functions, module-oriented programming etc). Those capabilities can be used only in CPLua.i can translate it to lua but i think that lua is not good enough
#6
Posted 08 March 2006 - 05:52 PM
What makes you think like that?i can translate it to lua but i think that lua is not good enough
![:)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#7
Posted 11 March 2006 - 10:32 AM
What makes you think like that?
i just tried to work with the programs written in cplua, too many errors... not interested
#8
Posted 11 March 2006 - 07:33 PM
#9
Posted 12 March 2006 - 08:28 AM
I don't think that you encountered "too many errors" because CPLua has too many bugs. Of course, there are still bugs buried here and there, but CPLua is not unstable, except for a few "musty corners". You had had a bad experience probably because you didn't use CPLua functions correctly. But if you are not interested, keep using CPBasic; it's much slower and very poor, but it's your choice.i just tried to work with the programs written in cplua, too many errors... not interested
#10
Posted 12 March 2006 - 09:47 AM
hey, don't forget to report it when you see itOf course, there are still bugs buried here and there, but CPLua is not unstable, except for a few "musty corners".
![;)](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/wink2.gif)
#11
Posted 12 March 2006 - 11:52 AM
#12
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:45 PM
![:huh:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/huh.png)
(I hope you didn't try to run the Lua programs in the standard mode "Program" on the CP...
![:rolleyes:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
#13
Posted 13 March 2006 - 02:58 PM
i had not ever never any problem running a program in an environment but lua!!!!!!!!!!
![:banghead:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif)
![:rant:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/motz.gif)
![:angry:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)
![:rant:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/motz.gif)
![:profanity:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/profanity.gif)
![:banghead:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/banghead.gif)
![:rant:](/dot/public/style_emoticons/default/motz.gif)
but i will try again sometime
#14
Posted 13 March 2006 - 03:48 PM
#15
Posted 22 May 2006 - 10:30 AM
i was working with suddenly i saw that we can not get long variable like matrices to any program function...I suppose You tried to run libraries not executables
what we should do to simply add a full matrix to a program variable
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users