Cogl: Opengl Dialect For Casio Calculators
#121
Posted 20 September 2006 - 10:29 PM
I'd like to see more about these differences between the 9850 and 9860 models
with regards to logic ops. Right now I can't try the 9860 version out because it's not here
in filesharing, and going to your website produces a network timeout error at the moment.
#122
Posted 21 September 2006 - 06:33 PM
EDIT:
Ok. I've uploaded them again. Now I understand why you've got a timeout. Electricity has gotten more expensive so I have to turn off my computer during the night, i.e. about 21:00 GMT. Also, I sleep much better with that noisemaker turned off . The server is usually up at 05:30 GMT. Sorry for the inconvenience |
#123
Posted 25 September 2006 - 09:55 PM
Now I understand why you've got a timeout. Electricity has gotten more expensive so I have to turn off my computer during the night, i.e. about 21:00 GMT. Also, I sleep much better with that noisemaker turned off .
Your own server in your home. Wow.
I'm still sticking with the cheap option: the advert-laden free webhost Lycos.
I don't know if this has already been mentioned but the Afx behaves like the 9860 in so far as it
doesn't accept complex numbers in Logic ops and is black and white,
so the Afx models should use the 9860 version of FX-GL.
About the 9860 version though:
Running the 3DGRAPH there was a Ma Error in GLINITE.
Upon investigation it was due Casio being very 'stupid/clever/make your own mind up' about
the way cat files handle the Not command.
I've started a new topic thread for the Not command.
#124
Posted 25 September 2006 - 10:30 PM
#125
Posted 26 September 2006 - 04:27 PM
If you prefer long titles then OK, I'll do that in the future .
No problemo... I just wasn't sure there was a bug in the system or not.
Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate that.
#126
Posted 26 September 2006 - 07:56 PM
Ergo, the casio people are fumbling .
This is quite disturbing, these bugs you've uncovered. Quick thought: Maybe caspro can remedy this?
Ok, I've emailed you files with the 'Not' command matched up with the file format.
#127
Posted 01 October 2006 - 02:53 PM
The 9860 version is not ready for release yet, but it will either be released as 1.0.2 or 1.0.3. I haven't decided yet .
Having the same version numbers on both means more work, but it is reasonable since you think of it as the API version number rather than the implementation version number. On the other hand, a leaping version number is more easy to work with since you increase the version number for each release independent on which backend the revision is for but may confuse the application programmer.
#128
Posted 10 October 2006 - 04:31 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users