Symbolix Computer Algebra System
#41
Posted 10 June 2008 - 05:27 AM
Because I've been getting numerous emails to bring back Symbolix, I'm now back on working on it. With the original source code lost, I rewrote Symbolix from what I have in my mind. I've got new features in the works, but for now I thought it would be sufficient to release a version with the same features that's more stable, rather than releasing v0.5 that's a bit buggy (for now).
And just for fun, I created a little video demonstrating Symbolix:
- Viliami likes this
#42
Posted 17 July 2008 - 07:13 AM
#43 Guest_mARDOXX_*
Posted 12 December 2008 - 11:02 PM
#44
Posted 13 December 2008 - 06:34 AM
What specifically are you looking for as in terms of features?
#45 Guest_Mardoxx_*
Posted 13 December 2008 - 10:10 PM
Variables to be single letters - no need for ab to be parsed as constant "ab" should be parsed as aXb... if variable needs to be "aa" or such, should be put around special characters? like square brackets maybe.
Parenthesis thing solved? asin closing bracket - it doesn't matter if it is there or not
Integration (partial - including +Constant... and contestant finder)
Rearranging of equations (can already be done with solver though)
History (replay) with arrow keys and ability to move cursor
scrolling of window to view history maybe, with f6 key or other?
scrolling window for long equations
Sub Script/Super Script
Super Script for powers
"text book" natural display for fractions/roots etc etc (ability to turn on/off in settings?) [replace * for X or / for division sign etc]
"text book" natural input of equations:
...d/dVAR2 for just partial differentiation
...dVAR1/dVAR2 for differentiation
...integral with no limits for partial integration [equation dVAR2]
Limits (like as x tends towards 0)
Integrals to +/-infinity
Limits to infinity
differential equations? [would be hard to do though]
Taylor/Maclaurin series expansion to n degrees
Summation of equations to nth degree then simplifying
Just things like that
I'll think of more if you want?
Making it open source? [BIG MAYBE]
Thanks in advance
#46 Guest_Mardoxx_*
Posted 14 December 2008 - 12:23 AM
#47
Posted 17 January 2009 - 07:27 PM
#48
Posted 08 March 2009 - 10:47 PM
#49
Posted 13 March 2009 - 08:34 PM
#50 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 25 April 2009 - 11:59 PM
would be awesome if you could make a stripped down version for 9860 though
#51
Posted 26 April 2009 - 12:56 AM
#52
Posted 27 April 2009 - 02:00 AM
#53 Guest_guest_*
Posted 29 April 2009 - 10:49 PM
but yeah, swapping sounds interesting
would be rather.. very slow though
#54
Posted 30 April 2009 - 09:45 AM
It has 4MB of flash (1.5MB "Storage Memory" can be used to store add-ins and other stuff). The RAM is much smaller: 512KB (64KB "Main Memory" for user).
@Manuel Naranjo:
Not all fx-9860 models have SD cards, so that isn't the best solution.
#55
Posted 01 May 2009 - 12:58 AM
mhh 64kB isn't enough for anything.No, 1.5MB RAM is wrong.
It has 4MB of flash (1.5MB "Storage Memory" can be used to store add-ins and other stuff). The RAM is much smaller: 512KB (64KB "Main Memory" for user).
Well it's a solution after all. Unless someone finds a way to add a memory chip to the device. It's been a long since last time I opened my calc. Maybe it can be hacked.@Manuel Naranjo:
Not all fx-9860 models have SD cards, so that isn't the best solution.
Still using the SD for swapping is something that should be taken into account. Any chance anyone can take a look at symbolix code just to see how it can be implemented?
#56
Posted 02 May 2009 - 09:27 AM
mhh 64kB isn't enough for anything.
Well it's a solution after all. Unless someone finds a way to add a memory chip to the device. It's been a long since last time I opened my calc. Maybe it can be hacked.
Still using the SD for swapping is something that should be taken into account. Any chance anyone can take a look at symbolix code just to see how it can be implemented?
I think such an action would be incredibly tricky and takes a lot more than it gives if you know what I mean.
Swapping is definetely a good idea (or mabye im biased), bt Symbolix code is proprietary (I dont think we even get the code for the calculator version, otherwise I could implement the CAS that I programmed).
Regards,
mintsmike
#57 Guest_Guest_amin_*_*
Posted 09 June 2009 - 02:44 PM
im offer in new version add:
1-symbolic determinan
2-symbolic or non_symbolic adjoint of a matrix
3-symbolic or non_symbolic rank of matrix
its very necessary for electrical Engineering.
you can calculate rank of matrix with SVD method.
thank you
#58 Guest_Derek_*
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:48 AM
#59 Guest_Matthew_*
Posted 20 December 2009 - 05:45 PM
#60 Guest_Mike_*
Posted 20 December 2009 - 06:08 PM
#61 Guest_Matt_*
Posted 20 December 2009 - 06:20 PM
#62
Posted 24 December 2009 - 05:57 AM
#63 Guest_Baz_*
Posted 04 January 2010 - 12:47 AM
i was wondering with this calculator is there anyway i could do symbolic integration? or is this completely implausible?
#64 Guest_Flip_*
Posted 27 October 2010 - 03:53 PM
(x + 3)
-----------------
(x - 8) (x + 5)
into
11 2
---------- + -----------
13 (x - 8) 13 (x + 5)
http://en.wikipedia....artial_fraction
#65
Posted 07 November 2010 - 07:22 PM
Is it possible that the development will continue on Casio PRIZM?
Since the PRIZM's storage memory is as large as 16Mb which is enough for swapping of some code back & forth the RAM (61kb), so, if the code swapping is possible by programming, low RAM should not be a problem anymore.
#66
Posted 02 April 2011 - 03:44 PM
#67
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:51 AM
Hello rakiem, it seems that that addin got corrupted during the file transfer. What I suggest you do is clean out the STORAGE memory and Optimize it. Then download Symbolix into the calculator again.
I don't think I understand what you are completely saying. You want to translate some LISP code into C, right?
Hi
I have got the same problem with symbolix,just get the system ERROR screen,have tried the clean out STORAGE memory and Optimized,
and downloaded Symbolix again but still the same problem.can you please help Thanyou.
#68
Posted 08 February 2013 - 03:35 PM
Could you make a Symbolix v0.45 version for SH4 please ?
It would be very helpful !
Thank you !
scientifix
#69
Posted 03 March 2014 - 04:07 PM
System ERROR
REBOOT : [EXIT ]
INITIALIALIZE:
TLB ERROR!!
TARGET=000000
PC =0000000
I have the casio fx-9860gII verios 02.02.0201. I don't know how to fix it, if the problem is due to the latest version not working on the fx-9860 then could someone link me an older version? Thankyou.
#70
Posted 03 March 2014 - 04:41 PM
Since kucalc hasn't been around for ... quite some time, your options are:
- get another CAS (jeuxcasio or Eigenmath, both a bit limited, but Symbolix is as well) or
- write another one yourself or fix up / expand an existing one or
- get another calculator with built-in CAS (maybe even smartphone or PC with a calculator emulator or a dedicated CAS on them) or
- do whatever you need to do by hand, almost always it isn't that hard.
#71
Posted 03 March 2014 - 05:02 PM
#72
Posted 04 March 2014 - 03:44 PM
#73
Posted 05 March 2014 - 01:41 AM
I have never actually done any programming myself so I will probably use the jeuxcasio as I doubt I'll be any good.
Why would you use something you doubt will be any good? (just curious)
#74
Posted 05 March 2014 - 04:20 PM
I mean I doubt I'll be very good at programming, so I will use CAS.Why would you use something you doubt will be any good? (just curious)
I have downloaded CAS off http://cas.jeuxcasio.com/en/. I couldn't find a manual for it. Does anyone know how to use its intergration function or is it just not working?
Edited by LexPoo, 05 March 2014 - 04:21 PM.
#75
Posted 06 March 2014 - 04:00 AM
Oh, ok I see.I mean I doubt I'll be very good at programming, so I will use CAS.
I'm not exactly sure... I will see if I can figure it out tomorrow morning.I have downloaded CAS off http://cas.jeuxcasio.com/en/. I couldn't find a manual for it. Does anyone know how to use its intergration function or is it just not working?
#76
Posted 12 March 2014 - 07:07 PM
To get intgr ( press F1and 2.
Intgr ( is not working for all the functions, trigonometrical functions aren t working for example
#77
Posted 19 March 2014 - 04:34 PM
Big thanks
Edited by LexPoo, 19 March 2014 - 04:37 PM.
#78
Posted 22 March 2014 - 07:36 PM
Sorry for the late reply, but I have got it to work I just didn't realize you had to specify a variable.
Big thanks
Cool, glad you got it working
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users