I am always wait for your answer.

Posted 15 June 2003 - 11:46 AM
Posted 20 June 2003 - 03:50 AM
Posted 20 March 2004 - 04:01 AM
Posted 20 March 2004 - 10:07 AM
Posted 21 March 2004 - 01:08 AM
Posted 21 March 2004 - 11:32 AM
Posted 21 March 2004 - 12:37 PM
Posted 22 March 2004 - 02:26 AM
Posted 22 March 2004 - 08:36 AM
Posted 23 March 2004 - 02:51 PM
I thought my v200 only had a 6 MHz processorIt should be faster than 12/15 MHz of TI.
Posted 23 March 2004 - 03:16 PM
Posted 23 March 2004 - 04:07 PM
Posted 26 March 2004 - 01:17 PM
Posted 26 March 2004 - 04:06 PM
Posted 26 March 2004 - 06:58 PM
Posted 26 March 2004 - 07:27 PM
Posted 26 March 2004 - 09:19 PM
Posted 29 March 2004 - 02:25 AM
Posted 29 March 2004 - 11:18 AM
Posted 03 April 2004 - 11:02 PM
Posted 03 April 2004 - 11:26 PM
Posted 03 May 2004 - 02:09 PM
Just to point out the SH-3 series is remarkably similar to the 68000 - so much so they've been sued countless times by Motorola. Definitely a CISC. Also, "newest" has nothing to do with a CPU's speed - by the early 90's you had 100MHz 68K and the latest incarnations (CF) are up to 333MHz. Low clock speed is simply to save battery life...>>"anyway, the big difference is that the classpad processor has a RISC (reduced instruction set computer) cpu and the ti's a CISC (complex instruction set computer)
and the SH-3 should be faster than the m68000 because the SH-3 because it's much newer than the m68000"
----
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users