doom
#1
Posted 29 June 2003 - 03:22 AM
thx
trav
#2
Posted 29 June 2003 - 09:55 AM
Have you changed any of the code yourself? Ie, if you are like me an want to rename lbl 0 to something more easily understood like 'start' you will have problems. Also, you may have changed a matrix or list which the program uses with another program, I'm not familiar with the game though.
If only Casio's could tell you program checksum so you could tell in a second if you're code was different in any way...
Shift' />
XYZ
#3
Posted 29 June 2003 - 04:43 PM
#4
Posted 29 June 2003 - 06:03 PM
[2ND][LEFT][RIGHT][ON]F6' />[SELF DESTRUCT]
Aleph
#5
Posted 29 June 2003 - 08:47 PM
F6' />
#6
Posted 29 June 2003 - 10:29 PM
yeah um i dunno some one figure it out
#7
Posted 29 June 2003 - 11:28 PM
#8
Posted 29 June 2003 - 11:53 PM
#9
Posted 30 June 2003 - 01:58 AM
thx
#10
Posted 30 June 2003 - 03:00 AM
if you still cant fix it I have one other idea we can try...
#11
Posted 30 June 2003 - 06:32 AM
Was just trying it on for size since I haven't seen a Casio version yetXYZ, I see that you posted on the HP news group. I mention this because I see in this post that you have the off key combination at the end of your post.
I don't think I'll use it again - too similar to John's [r->) [off], which incidentally has a better 'ring' to it than Shift' /> I think
He can probably claim ownership, smart fellow that he seems to be.
Have you done much work on your hp? I'd like to have a play with a 48, my 49 is niiice but sloooow.
(Woops, getting into murky waters here!)
Something I've noticed about my experiences with Casio, HP and TI - Casio writes FAST OS's - dialogue's and menus on both my hp49 and ti-92 are visibly slow to work with, where my afx's full-up menu's appear instantly.
Shift' />, erm, CTRL' /> [alt] DEL' />
XYZ
#12
Posted 30 June 2003 - 03:09 PM
#13
Posted 30 June 2003 - 09:38 PM
Anyway 1s is tolerable, but I don't think I could stand waiting 3.5s... My TI-92 (old version with rom 1.4 or something) is quite slow drawing pull-down menus, you get used to it and I'm happy to give up a little speed for battery life and extra features though. I'm keen to see what instalments HP has for its dormant calculator range in store for this year.
Wups meant to post in FDF....>>>>
#14
Posted 01 July 2003 - 12:19 AM
dunno why o well
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users