13 replies to this topic

[travo]

um i got doom1 for the cfx my cable is stuffed at the moment so i typed it out i ran throught the code about twice and im sure theres no mistakes but it gets stuck in a loop between drawing the screen and clearing it it wont get to anyother part of the code can anyone help? does the game even worK?
thx
trav

[XYZ]

I might normally be able to help you, but I'm out of breath after trying to read your post sorry

Have you changed any of the code yourself? Ie, if you are like me an want to rename lbl 0 to something more easily understood like 'start' you will have problems. Also, you may have changed a matrix or list which the program uses with another program, I'm not familiar with the game though.

If only Casio's could tell you program checksum so you could tell in a second if you're code was different in any way...

Shift' /> AC/on
XYZ

[Bob Vila]

i typed in the code manually a few weeks ago and it had funny movement keys, and i couldn't find anybody to fight, and it ran kinda slow, but it works

[AlephMobius]

XYZ, I see that you posted on the HP news group. I mention this because I see in this post that you have the off key combination at the end of your post. It seems that this is becoming quite a popular thing. I saw John H Meyers do this for a while before others started, was he the first? Anyways, I dont want to get off topic. Do any of you know about DOOM 3? I heard it may be only for the Xbox.

[2ND][LEFT][RIGHT][ON]F6' />[SELF DESTRUCT]
Aleph

[CrimsonCasio]

where did you get it from, the code might be flawed even if you typed it in right, if you give me a link I will look over the code and see if there are errors.

F6' />

[travo]

yeah well i never use fullstops so live with it "," i didnt change nething like lbl stuff ecxept lbl2 cause it had as go error so i made the subruitene into a seperate prog and made it jump to it but im sure thats fine so look for a prob else where "," um yeah doom 3 is coiming out on lotsa systems i think or at leased pc/xbox um the link is here: Doom code download...

yeah um i dunno some one figure it out

[Bob Vila]

like i said, it works. but maybe i'm the one who typed it in wrong

[CrimsonCasio]

ok, I looked at the code, tried it on my calc, and even shot a few things, as far as I can tell everything works perfectly... here is what I think happend: the problem you had with lbl 2 was probably created by leaving a " open or something like that, its happend to me before, the current problem is probably being caused by your modification so what you need to do is restore it to how it was. looking at the code I could find no other reason for a goto error for lbl 2.

[travo]

hmmmm i dunno i had a friend call out every line while i ran through it on my calc and i unless i can hear and read then i dont think i missed nething ill restore the code and see what happens
thx

[CrimsonCasio]

if there is an error I'm sure you will want to shoot yourself when you find it... I know I always did

if you still cant fix it I have one other idea we can try...

[XYZ]

XYZ, I see that you posted on the HP news group. I mention this because I see in this post that you have the off key combination at the end of your post.

Was just trying it on for size since I haven't seen a Casio version yet
I don't think I'll use it again - too similar to John's [r->) [off], which incidentally has a better 'ring' to it than Shift' /> AC/on I think
He can probably claim ownership, smart fellow that he seems to be.

Have you done much work on your hp? I'd like to have a play with a 48, my 49 is niiice but sloooow.
(Woops, getting into murky waters here!)

Something I've noticed about my experiences with Casio, HP and TI - Casio writes FAST OS's - dialogue's and menus on both my hp49 and ti-92 are visibly slow to work with, where my afx's full-up menu's appear instantly.

Shift' />, erm, CTRL' /> [alt] DEL' />

XYZ

[AlephMobius]

XYZ, My HP-48 shows menus very slowly but my TI-89 seems to show things about as fast as my AFX. One of the major advantages of the 49 is that it is supposed to display menus and stuff much faster than the HP-48. I have only 2 real complaints about the HP-48 and the speed problem of the OS is one of them. When I was playing with the HP-49 emulator it seemed to display almost as fast as the TI-89. Just for a test how long does it take for your HP-49 to fully display the flag browser? It takes my HP-48 about 3.5 seconds. I am going to move this to the Off-Topics discussion.

[XYZ]

AM, it takes just under a second I just installed rom 1.19-6 (the last produced by HP) which seems to graph a lot slower than the rom I had before though (1.16) and is a bit buggy....
Anyway 1s is tolerable, but I don't think I could stand waiting 3.5s... My TI-92 (old version with rom 1.4 or something) is quite slow drawing pull-down menus, you get used to it and I'm happy to give up a little speed for battery life and extra features though. I'm keen to see what instalments HP has for its dormant calculator range in store for this year.

Wups meant to post in FDF....>>>>

[travo]

fixed it only prob now is that i cant kill the stupid aliens which is a bit of a bitch
dunno why o well